I am sure that the editors of these magazines understand
only too well the ethics of healthy journalism, but have decided to dispense
with these and instead focus on sensationalism and a cockeyed view of the
world in order to boost sales.
What us impermissible, however, is that the targets of
these reports are always the minority, represented by the victims of social
wrongs such as Minamata disease or military sex slavery.
The magazines are therefore flattering and currying favor
with the majority in society at the expense of the less privileged, which
is, in a nutshell, behavior that is unfortunately endemic to Japanese society.
And these magazines have no small impact. Their combined
weekly and monthly publications have a circulation of more than 3 million.
Conspicuous advertisements on metropolitan commuter trains blare the headlines
of these magazines on millions more who havenUt even bothered to read the
articles.
These publications are available in highly public places
such as hospitals, banks and airplane, since they are classified as serious
sorts of magazines because they carry few nude photographs.
Japan, to many outsiders, remains an baffling place,
and this is partly because her citizens are so poorly informed. A recent
survey demonstrated that 87% of the Japanese public believes what they
read in newspapers.
But many newspaper reports, and particularly the Shinchosha
and Bungei Shunju publications, are biased; fact-checking is not a priority;
bylines are a rarity; and quotes are most often unattributed.
What is needed is a more sophisticated readership: the
Japanese need to develop the ability to interpret the information the media
provide rather than blindly believing it. The reporting contained in Shinchosha
and Bungei Shunju magazines is like a poison which has deeply permeated
the minds of large numbers of people.
However, unlike a physical poison which can be easily
identified and therefore cured, like food poisoning, the poison fomented
by these magazines works on the brain insidiously and cumulatively.
The media in Japan did not come into being on the foundation of a thorough discussion and understanding of such matters as human rights, freedom of the press, or freedom of speech. The spirit of criticism has never had the chance to develop and thrive in Japanese society. This, I believe, is the tragedy of modern Japan, and a condition which may only be corrected by speaking out.
Takesato Watanabe is a professor of journalism at Doshisha University in Kyoto, Japan.