Friday, July 18, 2003
War On Iraq Continues
The War On Iraq Continues
More than two months and two weeks after President George W. Bush announced the end of major operations in the war on Iraq, the man in charge of the occupation has admitted that the war continues. “It’s low intensity but it’s war however you describe it,” said Gen. John Abizaid, who replaced Gen. Tommy Franks.
Thus, despite US media proclamations that the war was over in April or May, the war continues, according even to the top US military official in the theater. On Sunday, the war will have raged for four months.
The US claims the resistance to the occupation comes mainly from Sadaam supporters and Baathist elements. Many have raised doubts about this assertion, but if it were true, it would mean the US has yet to achieve any of its stated principle objectives—regime change, disarmament, democracy, etc., etc. As sophisticated sabotage operations continue to destroy pipelines and otherwise interfere with the export of Iraq’s natural resources, it appears the US has yet to achieve its actual objectives—stealing Iraqi oil, extending US control over the region, etc., etc.
India and other countries have rejected requests by Washington to sacrifice their young on the altar of plundering Iraqi oil for the benefit of US oil, “defense,” infrastructure and related industries. Britain has scaled back its forces as the US has increased its troop strength with plans to increase further, meaning American soldiers find themselves increasingly all by their lonesome in the job of occupier. The most recent attack that killed one soldier from the U.S. Army’s 3rd Corps Support Command was greeted by spontaneous applause and cheering that “lasted minutes,” according to CNN reporter Harris Whitbeck. Meanwhile, back in Washington, President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney are themselves coming under fire—luckily for them only figuratively—for having lied to Congress.
No one cares that they lied to the public, which is expected, but when leaders lie to others in power, they may be held accountable. If they are held accountable, it will be a farce of justice. Just as Nixon was pushed from power not for murdering millions of Indochinese but for breaking into the Democratic Party headquarters, Bush and Cheney may be taken to task not for killing thousands of Afghanis and Iraqis but for lying to Senators Ted Kennedy, Joe Biden and the like.
Sadaam Hussein, like WMD, has yet to be found. Amazing how Osama bin Laden (who is reportedly on dialysis), Mullah Omar (who has only one eye) and Sadaam Hussein (who is hated in his own country) are all so hard to find and manage to evade capture by the richest, most powerful nation on earth.
In my opinion, the Republicans are preferrable to the Democrats because the Republicans are so dumb. Democrats commit the same sorts of atrocities but they do it with flare, diplomacy, cunning and patience, convincing large portions of many populations that their atrocities are actually blessings in disguise, that their invasions and attacks are actually “humanitarian intervention,” that “2 + 2 = 5” in the words of George Orwell. The Republicans are incompetent when it comes to professional propaganda, and so their crimes are open for the whole world to see. Ironically, being less capable of dissembling, they are in a sense more honest and keep us closer to the truth. How hard is it to figure out why Bush and his cabal wanted to invade and take over Iraq? The war was hardly started when subsidiaries of Halliburton and Bechtel were awarded their first “reconstruction” contracts. Of course, I’d prefer a democratic candidate to either a Democratic or Republican one, but if I have to choose between the two factions of the Big Business Party, I’ll take a dumb elephant over a smart donkey any day.
Now, we will have to see how long it takes the US to plant WMDs and/or to extract itself after installing a US business-friendly government in Baghdad that will be impervious to democratic influence.
Trivia Question:
This unelected leader killed thousands of innocent Iraqis, has invaded two sovereign nations, is widely despised throughout Iraq and the region, has lied to his own people, committed war crimes, stolen the natural wealth from the Iraqi people, snubbed the international community, caused a massive health crisis in Iraq, restricted press freedom in Iraq, has control over enormous amounts of weapons of mass destruction and refused to let UN arms inspectors into Iraq to search for weapons of mass destruction. Who is he?
Answer: US President George W. Bush
Saturday, July 05, 2003
-Films on Afghanistan, Chomsky, etc….
青山です
Films on Afghanistan, Noam Chomsky...etc. to be on in Tokyo in July,August and September. I will translate the info below later.
Yuka
*****************************************************************
１，土本典昭映画セミナー開催
２，「わたしのグランパ」夏休み特別モーニングショー決定!!
３，「チョムスキー 9.11」、2003年９月11日中野サンプラザ
でイベント上映
*****************************************************************
１，土本典昭映画セミナー開催
土本典昭フィルモグラフィー展実行委員会では、土本典昭映画
セミナーを開催します。第１回目は、７月23日（水）、24日（木）で、両
日ともお茶の水・アテネフランセ文化センター４Fホールにて行います。
今回のテーマは、「ロバート・フラハティー映画セミナー帰国報告会とア
フガニスタン新作完成記念上映会」です。ご参加下さい。
７月23日（水） ロバート・フラハティー・セミナー帰国報告上映会
上映作品：「アラン」 監督：ロバート・フラハティー（1934年 モノクロ 97分 35mm）「ドキュメント路上」 監督：土本典昭（1964年 モノクロ 54分 16mm）講演：ロバート・フラハティー・セミナー帰国報告土本典昭 聞き手：藤原敏史※セミナー帰国報告ビデオを上映します
７月24日（木） アフガンをめぐる新作完成記念上映会
上映作品：「もうひとつのアフガニスタン カーブル日記・1985年」（土本典昭私家版 2003年 カラー 42分 ビデオ）「よみがえれカレーズ」 監督：土本典昭（日本アフガニスタン合作 1989年 カラー116分 16mm）「在りし日のカーブル博物館 1988年」（土本典昭私家版 2003年 カラー 32分
ビデオ）講演：カーブル博物館の記憶を語る土本典昭＋土谷遥子（元カーブル博物館研究員
）主催：土本典昭フィルモグラフィー展実行委員会日時：両日とも17：00開場 17：30開映（22：00終了
予定）料金：前売券 1,800円 ※「チケットぴあ」にて絶賛発売中！！ 当日券 一般2,200円 学生1,800円会場：アテネフランセ文化センター４Fホール 東京都千代田区神田駿河台2-11 Tel 03-3291-4339
２，「わたしのグランパ」夏休み特別モーニングショー決定!!世界一かっこいいグランパが帰ってくる！
東陽一監督作品「わたしのグランパ」は、この夏休みモーニング・ロードショーです。８月９日（土）より渋谷・ユーロスペースにて、毎朝10時30分から１回上映となりますので、今年４月の公開時に既にご覧になっ
た方もそうでない方も、この機会をどうぞお見逃しなく！！ なんと初日（８月９日）には石原さとみさんが舞台挨拶に登場！メイキング映像の上映も行います。その他イベントも企画中です。最新情報は随時、公式サイト
grandpa.jp にてご案内しております。是非ご覧下さい！！※前売券（1,400円）は、７月中旬より「チケットぴあ」にて発売です。
３，「チョムスキー 9.11」、2003年９月11日中野サンプラザ でイベント上映「チョムスキー 9.11」（監督：ジャン・ユンカーマン）は、ニューヨークの同時多発テロから２年目を迎える今年の９月11日（木）に
、中野サンプラザでイベント上映を行います。「備えあれば憂いなし」と戦争参加への道を切り開く日本政府のやり方を止めるために、中野区民有志と＜9.11 in 中野＞実行委員会を作り『「チョムスキー 9.11」
を見て、いま何ができるかを考える 2,222人イベント in 中野』を行います。
第一部：ノーム・チョムスキーの9.11メッセージ映画「チョムスキー9.11」上映（74分）ノーム・チョムスキーの最新ビデオメッセージの上映（約20分）第二部：語りとライブで「今私たちにできること」を考え
る小室等（ミュージシャン）＋スペシャルゲストによるトーク＆ライブ（約60分）日時：2003年９月11日（木）場所：中野サンプラザ 大ホール主催：〈9.11 in 中野〉実行委員会後援：中野教育委員会(申請中) 協賛：シティテレビ中野入場料金：前売券 一般2,000円 大学生1,500円 小・中・高1,000円当日券 一般2,500円 大学生2,000円 小・中・高1,500円
children of the war
********************************************
[news mail 03 Jul 03] ?X?Z‘ì‚̃Cƒ?ƒNƒŒƒ|?[ƒg
********************************************
‘Children of the Gulf War’ photo exhibition UK tour
http://www.chimerafilms.co.uk/children.html
-Troops show uranium sickness signs
Midori at the ‘Children of the Gulf War’ photo exhibition UK tour writing.
Dr Douglas Rokke who is a former US Army nuclear health physicist is in
Australia for speech tour invited by the groupe who has organised the
‘Children of the Gulf War’ photo exhibition in Australia.
Dr Rokke said Iraqi women and children and American and Iraqi military
personnel had reported respiratory illnesses and rashes after the recent
conflict, and he had also been told of Australian servicemen and women with
similar symptoms.
Here is news from the ‘ Sydney Morning Herald’ on 23rd of June 2003. The
interview with Dr Douglas Rokke at the Al Jazeera radio is following after
that. It is quite long, but it has value to read I believe.
If you don’t want the news mails from me, please let me know. I will remove
your email address from my mailing list.
Thank you,
Midori
--
Midori Fujisawa
the ‘Children of the Gulf War’ photo exhibition UK tour
http://www.chimerafilms.co.uk/children.html
******************************
(Please spread it!)
1) Troops show uranium sickness signs, claims expert
June 23 2003 Sydney Morning Herald
2) Depleted uranium will affect Iraq for generations to come
Wednesday April 15 2003 Al Jazeera
******************************
1) Troops show uranium sickness signs, claims expert
AAP
June 23 2003 Sydney Morning Herald
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/06/23/1056220529069.html
Australian servicemen and women who served in the recent Iraq war were
reporting symptoms of uranium sickness, a United States nuclear weapons
expert said today.
Dr Douglas Rokke is a former US Army nuclear health physicist and was
formerly the Pentagon’s expert on the health effects of depleted uranium
ammunition.
Speaking in Melbourne today, Dr Rokke said Iraqi women and children and
American and Iraqi military personnel had reported respiratory illnesses and
rashes after the recent conflict, and he had also been told of Australian
servicemen and women with similar symptoms.
“That’s the reports I received from the US Army medical department. That’s
something that needs to be verified and looked into,” he said.
“When American soldiers are sick and the Iraqis are sick there’s nothing
that says an Australian soldier is going to be isolated when he goes through
those areas and he is not going to become ill.
During operation Desert Storm in 1991 Dr Rokke led a team assigned to clean
up uranium contamination caused by friendly fire.
“What we saw can be described in only three words - Oh my God! The wounds
were horrible, the contamination was extensive,” he said.
“Although myself and my team members wore respiratory and skin protection,
that protection we know today does not provide any adequate protection
against the inhalation, the ingestion, the absorption of uranium compounds.”
He said he now suffered rashes, respiratory problems, kidney problems and
cataracts related to his exposure to uranium.
Dr Rokke is in Australia to speak against the use of depleted uranium
weapons, which he describes as a crime against humanity, creating a
toxicological nightmare.
He is campaigning for the outlawing of depleted uranium munitions, medical
care for those who have been exposed to uranium and a clean-up of exposed
environments.
He will speak at public meetings and meet government officials and returned
service groups while in Australia.
“What I have learned from my work is that uranium munitions must be banned,”
Dr Rokke said.
“When we can no longer clean up the environment and we can no longer provide
medical care for anybody that’s exposed, then that weapon must never be used
in conflict.”
Jacob Grech, of the OzPeace Network, said while Australia did not use
depleted uranium munitions, the country exported between 2500 and 3000
tonnes of uranium to the United States each year for energy.
“It’s the waste energy products that is used in the manufacture of these
munitions.
“From the very start, before they are even made, Australia and the
Australian government is complicit in the production of these weapons.”
“We’d like our government as a bare minimum to put Australian service
veterans from the first and second Gulf wars, as well as Afghanistan,
through rigorous testing to get a baseline study of exactly what the health
effects are of depleted uranium and other chemical toxins ... and treat
them,” Mr Grech said.
“So far our government has been furphying, it’s been releasing reports which
parrot the Pentagon line six to 12 months later, it’s been in a state of
denial.”
Mr Grech said he had not yet had reports of service personnel from the most
recent conflict suffering uranium sickness, but there were a lot of veterans
from the first Gulf war displaying symptoms.
“I think what we are going to see with Australian returned service people
from the Gulf and Afghanistan is 20 years down the track exactly what
happened with agent orange in Vietnam,” Mr Grech said.
******************************
2) Depleted uranium will affect Iraq for generations to come
Wednesday April 15 2003 Al Jazeera
http://english.aljazeera.net/topics/article.asp?cu_no=1&item_no=2565&version
=1&template_id=273&parent_id=258
Our guest is professor Major Doug Rocke, former chief of the Depleted
Uranium Project at the Pentagon.
Prof Rocke says he suffered the effects of depleted uranium from the first
week of the Gulf War in 1991 but did not realise it until March 1995. Tests
showed that he had 5000 times the normal level of radiation in his body,
enough he says sarcastically, to light up a small village. He is also
suffering from problems with breathing, immune system and one eye. He has
had 15 surgical operations to his liver as a result of his infection by this
uranium syndrome.
The Presenter (Ahmed Mansour): Despite research by a large number of
scientists and experts on the enormous damage inflicted by depleted uranium
... and the use by the US in the Gulf War in 1991 , and wars in the Balkans
and Afghanistan in 1994 ,1995 , 1999 and 2000 ... The US use of depleted
uranium is not confined to the total destruction of targets but extends to
the destruction of the environment and human life in general in the affected
regions. Such areas will be unfit for habitation for millions of years.
Our guest is professor Major Doug Rocke, former chief of Depleted Uranium
Project at the Pentagon.
Born in Illinois 1949 , professor Doug Rocke joined the US Air Force in 1967
, took part in the Vietnam War from 1969 to 1971 as a B52 pilot. He obtained
his PhD in nuclear physics. He worked until 1996 as a field doctor and
specialist in nuclear physics in the US Army. He took part in the 1991 Gulf
War, tasked with depleted uranium clean up in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait.
>From March to June 1991 , Prof Rocke compiled contaminated equipment from
the battlefield and shipped part of it back to the US and supervised the
burial of more equipment in Saudi Arabian deserts. He was appointed head of
the Depleted Uranium Project in the Pentagon between 1 August 1994 and
November 1995 . He also worked as a professor of nuclear physics at Jackson
University - Alabama until 2000 .
Prof Rocke says he suffered the effects of depleted uranium from the first
week of the Gulf War in 1991 but did not realise it until March 1995 . Tests
showed that he had 5000 times the normal level of radiation in his body,
enough he says sarcastically, to light up a small village. He is also
suffering from problems with breathing, immune system and one eye. He has
had 15 surgical operations to his liver as a result of his infection by this
uranium syndrome.
Q: At this very critical time, a lot of people are trying to understand and
know more about the weapons containing depleted uranium which the United
States plans to use… Despite all the studies and research that came up
during the last period and confirmed the risks of using the depleted
uranium, officials at the Pentagon announced that they are going to use
depleted uranium bombs in Iraq again. What is your understanding of this
announcement?
Professor Rocke: The announcement is very simple. Uranium munitions kill and
destroy everything that they contact. Going back to the (1991) Gulf War and
even before, the Pentagon had decided to use weapons that are absolutely
efficient in combat. At the completion of the 1991 Gulf War when I was
specifically assigned to clean up the uranium mess I received a memorandum,
this is a Los Alamos memorandum written by a colonel at Los Alamos national
laboratories in New Mexico. In that memorandum, he said “Even though we know
there are health and environmental effects, you should make sure that we can
always use uranium munitions in combat because they are so effective. And
therefore lie about the health and environmental effects of the use of
uranium munitions in combat.”
Smoke rises over the Iraqi capital Baghdad following further bombing raids
by US-led forces, March 22
The Presenter: Being the former chief of the depleted uranium project in the
Pentagon, what are the risks of using depleted uranium on life and human
beings in general?
Professor Rocke: The first thing that we have to understand is that each
individual uranium round fired by an Abrams tank is ten pounds of solid
uranium contaminated with plutonium, neptunium and americium. On impact, you
have a fine uranium outside dust that is generated. This represents about
one half of the original mass. So if you have 4500 grams, you have about
2300 grams or 2200 grams that turn into a dust on the outside, they can be
inhaled .. and then get into the body. When this happens, you have all kinds
of serious problems both metal poisoning and radiological effects on the
body.
The Presenter: Being one of the victims of depleted uranium, can you
describe the symptoms you felt when you were infected?
Professor Rocke: The most significant effect that we noticed was respiratory
problems. And the respiratory problems acted like you had a really bad case
of bronchitis. Your respiratory system was affected, you couldn’t breathe as
well and you started noticing all kinds of serious apparatus effects with
your breathing system. The other health effect we saw immediately in
ourselves and everybody else was the terrible rash. And the rash that we
suspect and which we still have to this day is from the heavy metal
poisoning that occurs just as if you would have eaten a litre of any other
heavy toxic metal.
The Presenter: Dr. Rocke, What are the most important symptoms of inhaling
depleted uranium?
Professor Rocke: The biggest problem that we had, in addition to the
respiratory problems, is cancer which developed in members of our team
within eight to nine months. Within two years, additional cancers developed
and people started to die. Individuals that we had confirmed had embedded
uranium shrapnel deliberately locked in their bodies by the United States
Department of Defence did develop tumours in and around that embedded
shrapnel. Published research verifies that uranium shrapnel or uranium
embedded in the tissue will cause cancer. That we see in any place that
uranium has been used, manufactured and processed .... in various areas of
the United States.
The Presenter: But Michael Kilpatrick, who was responsible for providing
medical care to the veterans at the Pentagon, said in a press conference
that a study covering 90 infected veterans from the 1991 Gulf War proved
that they were not suffering from any disease, whether it be cancer or
otherwise. What do you say about this?
Professor Rocke: Dr. Kilpatrick lied to the world. It is very simple. First
he stated that 90 individuals were affected ..... I had well over 100
individuals who were affected. I had another 250 individuals who were
absolutely exposed while we were cleaning it up?c?c?c
The Presenter: Why did your colleagues in the Pentagon lie and for the
benefit of whom?
Professor Rocke: The reason that they lie is to avoid any liability for the
deliberate use of uranium munitions not only in Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait,
throughout the Balkans and throughout all the sites in the United States.
Again the purpose of the war is to kill and to destroy. Uranium munitions
are absolutely destructive.
The Presenter: On 3 February 2003 an official from the Veteran’s Association
in Britain said that 560 British soldiers have died since 1991 from Gulf War
Syndrome and that 5000 are under treatment. Do you have any statistics on
the number of wounded American soldiers?
Professor Rocke: Yes, I do. The US Department of Veterans’ Affairs released
a report in September 2002 . In that report they formally acknowledged that
there are over 160000 Gulf War veterans permanently disabled and over 8000
dead from the effects of Gulf War syndrome… It (Iraq) is a toxic
wasteland that is absolutely proven to exist today by additional statistics.
House destroyed from a missile during an air strike in Baghdad
The Presenter: What are the main diseases that can be caused by uranium?
Professor Rocke: The problems that we have are very significant. We have the
respiratory problems, all the eye problems, neurological problems, and
cancers. What we know today is that the American veterans who participated
in the 1991 Gulf War are dying at a rate of over 140 a month here in the
United States alone.
The Presenter: You said that 36% of the veterans who took part in the 1991
Gulf War will die because of cancer and that 160000 are handicapped and 8000
have already died but still the US insists on using uranium. Do you expect
more cases of infection from uranium?
Professor Rocke: Absolutely. We have already seen additional casualties
coming back. Although the war ended in the fall of 1991 , the US continued
to send troops to that region. Today we know, actually verified by the
United States Department of Veteran Affairs that there are now over a
quarter of a million American soldiers who served during the Gulf War and
stayed in the region until May 2002 are now permanently disabled due to
complex exposures. And we also now know that over 10000 are dead and that
the current death rate is over a 140 a month.
The Presenter: What happened to the inhabitants of Kuwait, Iraq and north of
Saudi Arabia as a result of the spread of 400 tonnes of uranium dust?
Professor Rocke: There is no doubt in my mind whatsoever that the health
effects that we have seen in the women, the children and other residents of
that region is absolutely due in part to the uranium contamination that has
been left there. Congressional representatives and scientists, and
independent individuals from all over the world have gone over there and
verified the level of contamination and that contamination has not been
removed as required by US Department of Defence directives.
The Presenter: Professor Harry Shalimer has said that at least 100,000 of
the inhabitants of Basra have been infected with cancer since 1991 . Do you
have any statistics on the number of infections in these regions?
Professor Rocke: I have not been back to Iraq since the 1991 Gulf War, but I
have talked to Dr. Shalimer and other scientists and physicians involved in
this. I have no doubt in my mind that Dr. Shalimer is probably correct. I
know for a fact that he has verified uranium in those individuals residing
in that region and therefore you can make a direct correlation between those
exposures and the health effects that have been documented.
Dr. Shalimer again is one of the world’s experts on this, so we must listen
to him.
The Presenter: Do you have any information about the uranium ammunition that
the US is going to use in its war against Iraq?
Professor Rocke: Absolutely… The uranium munitions that will be used are
again and once more the rounds that will be fired by the Abrams tank. Each
round is over 4500 grams of solid uranium contaminated with plutonium,
neptunium and americium. The A- 10 Warthog aircraft will additionally fire
the 30 ml round, that is, each individual round is 300 grams of solid
uranium. We also know that the Bradley fighting vehicle will fire the 25 ml
round, and each individual round is over 200 grams of solid uranium. In
addition, cruise missiles contain uranium components, and the giant bunker
busters contain uranium components.
The Presenter: A weapons expert, Dai Williams, in one of our programs said
that the ammunition used by the US in the 1991 Gulf War weighed around 5
kilograms, and against Afghanistan they used bombs and ammunition of up
10000 pounds, and it is expected that they are going to use the same
ammunition in Iraq. They even announced that the mother of bombs weighs
10000 tonnes. If the previous Gulf War left around 400 tonnes of uranium
dust, what do you expect will happen to the region this time?
Professor Rocke: What I expect is that we will again see serious health
effects in the American soldiers who go there and use it. We will see health
effects in all the residents of that region. We will see health effects in
the Iraqi soldiers who will be the targets of direct uranium used by US
forces. I must repeat and make this very clear, as the head of the project
to clean up uranium munitions during the 1991 Gulf War, and as the director
of the Depleted Uranium Project for the Department of Defence who did the
research, and as a DU casualty, the use of uranium munitions during warfare
is a crime against God, is a crime against humanity, and should be
considered a war crime. You cannot take solid uranium radioactive waste,
throw it in anybody’s backyard and refuse to provide medical care and
complete the environmental clean-up that is required to sustain the health
and safety of the citizens of the earth.
The Presenter: Do you think depleted uranium is considered a weapon of mass
destruction or a nuclear weapon?
Professor Rocke: The United Nations on 10 September 2001 did rule that
uranium munitions were considered a weapon of mass destruction. The European
Parliament has issued a proclamation that uranium munitions should be banned
from use in the world.
The Presenter: Do you think that using depleted uranium against human beings
in general falls under the category of crimes of war?
Professor Rocke: Absolutely, because in the United States you cannot even
take 500 grams of solid uranium and throw it in anybody’s backyard without
going to jail. Therefore, what right has the United States, England or any
other nation has to take hundreds and hundreds of tons of uranium and throw
them in somebody else’s backyard, refuse them medical care as they have done
now for decades and also refuse to clean up the environment.
The Presenter: Professor Dracovic said that the cleaning of the region needs
$ 200 billion. Is it possible to clean up the region (if this fund is
raised)?
Professor Rocke: The problem that we have, when I actually did the research,
was to determine how to clean up. For each and every vehicle that is struck
by a single uranium munition you have to take that entire vehicle, and
physically remove it. Then you have to clean up all the uranium penetration
that is left around that vehicle. Then you have to take a bulldozer, and go
out to at least 100 metres and scrape down at least 10 centimetres and
remove all of that dirt in order to make that area safe again, that is for
each and every vehicle.
The Presenter: If Baghdad is being struck by such ammunition, how far will
the effects of such uranium impact the surrounding areas of Baghdad?
Professor Rocke: Studies in the United States by one of the former
scientists in this area measuring the uranium contamination from a
production plant in the United States showed that the uranium contamination
has caused adverse health effects within 50 kilometres.
The Presenter: This is around the plant itself, what about the dust and the
wind?
Professor Rocke: The wind carried the uranium dust 50 kilometres away from
the plant and there were sufficient quantities to cause adverse health
effects. We know today that in and around all the production facilities
where they are making uranium munitions there are cancers, kidney problems,
respiratory problems, rations, neurological problems in the residents of
that area.
The Presenter: Some studies say that in the areas affected in the Balkans,
uranium dust travelled more than 1000 kilometres and reached a lot of
European capitals. Do you think that Kuwaitis, Saudis, Iraqis and Jordanians
are safe from the uranium dust that Iraq might be hit with?
Professor Rocke: You have the whole combination of by-products of the war.
When we destroy the infrastructure of Iraq… when we deliberately use
uranium munitions and contaminate the air, water and soil, the entire region
becomes a toxic wasteland. And again the reason that we know that it is a
toxic wasteland today is that since 1991 , the United States has continued
to send American soldiers into the region. Since 1991 , an additional 60000
American veterans have been labelled as permanently disabled from this
exposure and another 3000 have been confirmed dead.
The Presenter: How long can these areas remain contaminated?
Professor Rocke: The contamination will remain in the area unless it is
physically and totally removed, for 4.5 billion years and beyond.
The Presenter: Will these areas remain contaminated for 4.5 billion years?
Professor Rocke: Unless it is physically removed according to the procedures
and processes that I have developed for the US Department of Defence.
The Presenter: Those contaminated areas, are they fit for human life now?
Professor Rocke: They are not. The US Department of Defence, in the common
test training for use of uranium munitions, specifically states that all
American soldiers must wear full respirator and skin protection within 25 to
50 metres of each and every vehicle that is struck by uranium munitions.
The Presenter: Having supervised the burial of some of the waste in 1991 ,
how true is that some of the areas north of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait are no
longer fit for human habitation, and that people should be prevented from
going into these areas?
Professor Rocke: Absolutely. The entire… area near Basra, the
contamination there is absolutely verified. US Congressmen, James McDermott
and his staff went over to Iraq in the fall of last year. They measured the
contamination and verified that it was so great that people should be
prevented from entering that area permanently until all of it is cleaned up.
The Presenter: Also, the region that could be hit by uranium ammunition,
whether Baghdad or other Iraqi cities, would they be contaminated also, and
the contamination there will be for 4.5 billion years again?
Professor Rokke: Absolutely…
The Presenter: Is it possible that Baghdad, Basra and other cities will be
unfit for human life after this war?
Professor Rocke: If you destroy the entire infrastructure ..... and if Iraq
does possess any chemical, biological or radioactive materials and you
destroy them, that would be just like hitting an ice cube with a hammer. All
you do is split it. If you use uranium munitions and you do not clean it up,
the entire area will be a toxic wasteland, that unless all environmental
clean-up is completed will be uninhabitable.
An explosion rocks one of Saddam Hussein’s palaces in Baghdad during air
strikes
The Presenter: This means that there are more than 20 million human beings
in Iraq who are subject to being hit by uranium, and if Iraq will be hit by
uranium munitions it will be unfit for human habitation. Does this mean that
the United States will eliminate a total country from the surface of the
earth?
Professor Rocke: That is an absolute possibility. When you destroy the
infrastructure, you use all the types of munitions and you contaminate air,
water and soil. That is an absolute possibility…
The Presenter: Can simple human beings who are living in Iraq, and who have
nothing to do and are helpless, can they do anything against the United
States, which will not hesitate to use uranium against them?
Professor Rocke: For years, as the individual that cleaned up uranium
munitions in the 1991 Gulf War, and as the director of the Depleted Uranium
Project, I have requested and I have insisted that the United States and
other countries refrain from using uranium munitions in combat. Uranium
munitions must be banned from use on earth and in the universe for eternity.
At the same time, I have requested numerous times that medical care be
provided not only for the fired casualties on my staff, but for thousands
and thousands of individuals who have been exposed. And I have also
requested numerous times that all uranium contamination be cleaned up.
However, those requests have been denied, denied, and denied.....
The Presenter: Since you stayed in the region until 1996 and supervised a
lot of activities and you know the contaminated areas, is it possible to
give us a list of contaminated areas in Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Kuwait...?
Professor Rocke: One of the problems we have is that the United States
Department of Defence has not identified all the areas where uranium
munitions have been used. So therefore, individuals who reside in that area
must look for the ... signature of uranium munitions use.
On a destroyed vehicle you will see a clean round hole around the area. You
will also see black dust surrounding the area. Any vehicle or structure that
you see that has this signature you should not approach within 100 metres
unless you are wearing full skin and respiratory protection.
The Presenter: What are the symptoms so that if they appear on the
inhabitants of those areas they can tell they have been exposed?
Professor Rocke: The first symptom that will show up ..... will be the
respiratory problems. It acts like a chronic bronchitis. The second thing
that you will probably see is the rashes.
The Presenter: The infections that showed up in the south of Iraq and the
deformities in the newborn, do you expect these to last for 4.5 billion
years? Is there a possibility that in the future generations more
complications will come up?
Professor Rocke: Absolutely… Again as along as individuals are being
exposed to uranium, we know that the changes in the RNA in DNA, the changes
that occur genetically are causing all of these birth effects. We have seen
those birth effects in American soldiers who were exposed. We are seeing
those birth effects all over the world where uranium exposures have
occurred.
The Presenter: Can the insistence of the United States to use this
ammunition again against human beings and against Iraq be considered a new
war crime?
Professor Rocke: Anybody who uses uranium munitions in war must understand
that it is a crime against God and it is a crime against humanity… Yes, it
is. When you deliberately and wilfully spread radioactive waste, ignore the
health effects and refuse to clean it up, that is a crime against God and a
crime against humanity.
The Presenter: What do you think the size of the disaster that will result
from using hundreds of tonnes of uranium in the war against Iraq? If this is
the picture given for the past 10 years, what will be from the result on the
region of using uranium again?
Professor Rocke: If we have the same exposures and we have extensive use we
can estimate that the number of casualties and the percentage of people in
the area… that is going to be 30 % again. That is the numbers, we cannot
change the statistics. We cannot change the epidemiological effects of all
of the contamination that results from war.
-US troops ‘shoot civilians
US troops ‘shoot civilians’
By Bob Graham, Evening Standard, in Baghdad
19 June 2003
American soldiers in Iraq today make the astonishing admission that they
regularly kill civilians.
(This is London homepage)
http://www.thisislondon.com/news/articles/5401680?source=Evening%20Standard
In a series of disturbing interviews which throws light on the chaos
gripping the country, GIs also confess to leaving wounded Iraqi fighters to
die, and even to shooting injured enemy
soldiers. They say they are frequently confronted by fighters dressed as
civilians, including women.
Their response is often to shoot first and ask questions later, even when it
means killing genuine civilians. Yesterday, US troops killed at least one
man and injured three others during a demonstration in Baghdad by former
Iraqi soldiers protesting at not being paid for two months. US troops first
fired into the air and then into the crowd after the demonstrators began
throwing stones and bricks.
In the worsening cycle of violence, American tactics like these are feeding
the resentment of many Iraqis who object to the occupation of their country.
US troops are facing a growing number of hitandrun guerrilla attacks and
more than 40 soldiers have been killed since George Bush declared the war
over seven weeks ago.
The threat American soldiers feel was illustrated today when a coalition-run
humanitarian aid office north of Baghdad was shelled, killing one Iraqi
worker and wounded 12. The attack represents a tactical shift by the
guerillas as they target fellow Iraqis deemed to be too close to the allies.
One of the soldiers interviewed by the Evening Standard, Specialist Anthony
Castillo, of the 3/15th US Infantry, said: “When there were civilians there,
we did the mission that had to be done. When they were there, they were at
the wrong spot, so they were considered enemy.”
The soldiers are furious that their commanders have reneged on promises to
send them home as soon as the war
was won and are now forcing them into the role of peacekeepers.
The interviews will make troubling reading for US and British politicians
and senior military staff desperate to pacify the country and impose order
before a transfer to a civilian government run by Iraqis.
[full interview]
‘I just pulled the trigger’
By Bob Graham, Evening Standard, in Baghdad
19 June 2003
(This is London homepage)
http://www.thisislondon.com/news/articles/5402104
At first glance they appear to be the archetypal Band Of Brothers of
Hollywood myth, brave and honest men united in common purpose.
But a closer look at these American GIs, sweltering in the heat of an
unwelcoming Iraq, reveals the glazed eyes and limp expressions of those who
have witnessed a war they do not understand and have begun to resent. By
their own admission these American soldiers have killed civilians without
hesitation, shot wounded fighters and left others to die in agony.
What they told me, in a series of extraordinary interviews, will make
uncomfortable reading for US and British politicians and senior military
staff desperate to prevent the liberation of Iraq turning into a quagmire of
Vietnam proportions, where the behaviour of troops feeds the hatred of an
occupied people.
Sergeant First Class John Meadows revealed the mindset that has led to
hundreds of innocent Iraqi civilians being killed alongside fighters
deliberately dressed in civilian clothes. “You can’t distinguish between
who’s trying to kill you and who’s not,” he said. “Like, the only way to get
through s*** like that was to concentrate on getting through it by killing
as many people as you can, people you know are trying to kill you. Killing
them first and getting home.”
These GIs, from Bravo Company of the 3/15th US Infantry Division, are caught
in an impossible situation. More than 40 of their number have been killed by
hostile forces since 1 May - when President Bush declared major military
operations were over - and the number of hit-and-run attacks is on the
increase. They face a resentful civilian population and, hiding among it, a
number of guerrilla fighters still loyal to the old regime. A lone Iraqi
sniper nicknamed The Hunter is believed to have claimed his sixth American
victim this week in a suburb of Baghdad.
The man, said to be a former member of the Republican Guard Special Forces,
has developed a cult status among some Iraqis. One Baghdad resident, Assad
al Amari, said: “He is fighting for Iraq on his own. There will be many more
Americans killed because they cannot stop The Hunter. He will be given the
protection of people who will let him use their homes for his shooting.”
In this hostile atmosphere the men of Bravo Company are asked to maintain
order, yet at the same time win hearts and minds. It is not a dilemma they
feel able to resolve. They spoke to me - dressed in uniforms they have worn
for the past six weeks - at their base in Fallujah. Here US troops killed 18
demonstrators at a pro-Saddam rally soon after the war and now face local
fighters bent on revenge.
Their attitude to these dangers is summed up by Specialist (Corporal)
Michael Richardson, 22. “There was no dilemma when it came to shooting
people who were not in uniform, I just pulled the trigger. It was up close
and personal the whole time, there wasn’t a big distance. If they were
there, they were enemy, whether in uniform or not. Some were, some weren’t.”
Specialist Anthony Castillo added: “When there were civilians there we did
the mission that had to be done. When they were there, they were at the
wrong spot, so they were considered enemy.” In one major battle - at the
southern end of Baghdad at the intersection of the main highways - the
soldiers estimate about 70 per cent of the enemy’s 400-or-so fighters were
dressed as civilians.
Sgt Meadows explained: “The fight lasted for about eight hours and they just
kept on coming all day from everywhere, from all sides. They were all in
plain clothes.
“We had dropped fliers a couple of days prior saying to people to get out of
the area if they didn’t want to fight, so basically anyone who was there was
a combatant. If they were dumb enough to stand in front of tanks or drive a
car
towards a tank, then they were there to fight. On that day it took away the
dilemma of who to fire at, anyone who was there was a combatant.”
Cpl Richardson added: “That day nothing went with the training. There were
females fighting; there were some that, when they saw you f****** coming,
they’d just drop their s*** and try to give up; and some guys were shot and
they’d play dead, and when you’d go by they’d reach for their weapons. That
day it was just f****** everything. When we face women or injured that try
to grab their weapons, we just finish them off. You’ve gotta, no choice.”
Such is their level of hatred they preferred to kill rather than merely
injure. Sgt Meadows, 34, said: “The worst thing is to shoot one of them,
then go help him.” Sergeant Adrian Pedro Quinones, 26, chipped in: “In that
situation you’re angry, you’re raging. They’d just been shooting at my men -
they were putting my guys in a casket and eight feet under, that’s what they
were trying to do.
“And now, they’re laying there and I have to help them, I have a
responsibility to ensure my men help them.” Cpl Richardson said: “S***, I
didn’t help any of them. I wouldn’t help the f******. There were some you
let die. And there were some you double-tapped.”
He held out his hand as if firing a gun and clucked his tongue twice. He
said: “Once you’d reached the objective, and once you’d shot them and you’re
moving through, anything there, you shoot again. You didn’t want any
prisoners of war. You hate them so bad while you’re fighting, and you’re so
terrified, you can’t really convey the feeling, but you don’t want them to
live.”
These soldiers have faced fighters from other Arab countries. “It wasn’t
even Iraqis that we was killing, it was Syrians,” said Sgt Meadows. “We
spoke to some of the people and Saddam made a call for his Arab brothers for
a holy war against us, and they said they came here to fight us. Whadda we
ever do to them?”
Cpl Richardson intervened: “S***, that didn’t really matter who they were.
They wanted to fight us so they were the enemy. We had to take over Baghdad,
period, it didn’t matter who was in there.”
The GIs spoke of shooting civilians at roadblocks. Sgt Meadows said: “When
they used white flags we were told to stop them at 400 metres out and then
strip them down naked then bring them through. Most obeyed the order. We
knew about others who had problems with [Iraqis] carrying white flags and
then opening up on our guys. We knew about every trick they were trying to
do. Then they’d use cars to try and drive at us. They were men, women and
children. That day we shot up a lot of cars.
“We’d shoot warning shots at them and they’d keep coming, so we’d kill them.
We’d fire a warning shot over the top of them or on the road. When people
criticise us killing civilians they don’t know that a lot of these civilians
were combatants, they really were . And they still are.”
The men have been traumatised by their experiences. Cpl Richardson-said: “At
night time you think about all the people you killed. It just never gets off
your head, none of this stuff does. There’s no chance to forget it, we’re
still here, we’ve been here so long. Most people leave after combat but we
haven’t.”
Sgt Meadows said men under his command had been seeking help for severe
depression: “They’ve already seen psychiatrists and the chain of command has
got letters back saying ‘these men need to be taken out of this situation’.
But nothing’s happened.” Cpl Richardson added: “Some soldiers don’t even
f****** sleep at night. They sit up all f****** night long doing s*** to
keep themselves busy - to keep their minds off this f****** stuff. It’s the
only way they can handle it. It’s not so far from being crazy but it’s their
way of coping. There’s one guy trying to build a little pool out the back,
pointless stuff but it keeps him busy.”
Sgt Meadows said: “For me, it’s like snap-shot photos. Like pictures of
maggots on tongues, babies with their heads on the ground, men with their
heads halfway off and their eyes wide open and mouths wide open. I see it
every day, every single day. The smells and the torsos burning, the entire
route up to Baghdad, from 20 March to 7 April, nothing but burned bodies.”
Specialist Bryan Barnhart, 21, joined in: “I also got the images like
snapshots in my head. There are bodies that we saw when we went back to
secure a place we’d taken. The bodies were still there and they’d been
baking in the sun. Their bodies were bloated three times the size.”
Sgt Quinones explained: “There are psychiatrists who are trying to sort out
their problems but they say it’s because of long combat environment. They
know we need to be taken away from that environment.” But the group’s tour
of duty has been extended and the men have been forced to remain as
peacekeepers. Cpl Richardson said: “Now we’re in this peacekeeping, we’re
always firing off a warning shot at people that don’t wanna listen to you.
You make up the rules as you go along.
“Like, in Fallujah we get rocks thrown at us by kids. You wanna turn round
and shoot one of the little f*****s but you know you can’t do that. Their
parents know if they came out and threw rocks we’d shoot them. So that’s why
they send the kids out.” Sgt Meadows said: “Can you imagine being a soldier
and being told ‘you’re fighting a war, then when you finish you can go
home’.
“You go and fight that war, and you win decisively, but now you have to stay
and stabilise the situation. We are having to go from a full warfighting
mindset to a peacekeeping mindset overnight. Right after shooting at people
who were trying to kill you, you now have to help them.”
The anger towards their own senior officers is obvious. Cpl Richardson said:
“We weren’t trained for this stuff now. It makes you resentful they’re
holding us on here. It pisses everyone off, we were told once the war was
over we’d leave when our replacements get here. Well, our replacements got
here and we’re still here.”
Specialist Castillo said: “We’re more angry at the generals who are making
these decisions and who never hit the ground, and who don’t get shot at or
have to look at the bloody bodies and the burnt-out bodies, and the dead
babies and all that kinda stuff.” Sgt Quinones added: “Most of these
soldiers are in their early twenties and late teens. They’ve seen, in less
than a month, more than any man should see in a whole lifetime. It’s time
for us to go home.”
On whether the war was one worth fighting, Sgt Meadows said: “I don’t care
about Iraq one way or the other. I couldn’t care less. [Saddam] could still
be in power and, to me, it wasn’t worth leaving my family for; for getting
shot at and almost dying two or three times, there’s nothing worth that to
me.” Even though no Iraqis were involved, and there is no proof Saddam was
behind it, the attack on the World Trade Center provides Cpl Richardson and
many others with the justification for invading Iraq.
“There’s a picture of the World Trade Center hanging up by my bed and I keep
one in my Kevlar [flak jacket]. Every time I feel sorry for these people I
look at that. I think, ‘They hit us at home and, now, it’s our turn.’ I
don’t want to say payback but, you know, it’s pretty much payback.”
-Deadly waste returned to US forces
Dear friends,
Midori at the ‘children of the Gulf War’ photo exhibition UK tour writing.
Following two articles came from the ?eGreenpeace International?f homepage,
the latest news about Tuwaitha, Iraq. I had sent you news of the
contamination of the ?eyellowcake?f at Tuwaitha two months ago. If you don?f
t know about that, please visit our homepage, you can find the back issue of
our news mail titled ?eAl-Tuwaitha turned into a Horrific
Uranium-contamination Zone?f. The people who living in that area need
emergency support. Please read and spread it widely!
(news mails are here.)
http://www.chimerafilms.co.uk/children_nme.html
Thank you,
Midori
--
Midori Fujisawa
the ‘Children of the Gulf War’ photo exhibition UK tour
http://www.chimerafilms.co.uk/children.html
***************************************
Deadly waste returned to US forces
***************************************
Tue 24 June 2003 IRAQ/Baghdad
http://www.greenpeace.org/international_en/news/details?item_id=285508&print
=1
They claimed they were after weapons of mass destruction, but then allowed
nuclear material to be carried off by the barrel. They said errant nuclear
waste poses no health threat to the people in Iraq, but then denied access
to experts. We delivered a dose of reality to the occupying forces: villages
surrounding the Tuwaitha nuclear complex, just south of Baghdad, are
contaminated with deadly radiation. Clean up must begin now.
A convoy of vehicles bearing Greenpeace banners that read “Al Tuwaitha -
nuclear disaster - Act now!” with a single activist walking at its head,
carrying a white flag, returned a large uranium “yellow cake” mixing
canister to the US military guards stationed at the heart of the nuclear
plant. The canister - the size of a small car - contained significant
quantities of radioactive “yellowcake” and had been dumped on a busy section
of open ground near the Tuwaitha plant. Despite the military being aware of
its presence, locals say it has been left open and unattended for more than
20 days.
“If this had happened in the UK, the US or any other country, the villages
around Tuwaitha would be swarming with radiation experts and decontamination
teams. It would have been branded a nuclear disaster site and the people
given immediate medical check-ups. The people of Iraq deserve no less from
the international community. That they are being ignored is a scandal that
must be rectified without delay,” said Mike Townsley of Greenpeace
International.
[To read more]
http://www.greenpeace.org/international_en/news/details?item_id=285508&print
=1
************************
Radioactive barrel swap
************************
Sat 28 June 2003 IRAQ/Baghdad
http://www.greenpeace.org/news/details?item_id=288792
For many local people, the need for water storage overrides the unseen
threat of radioactivity. We took clean water containers into the communities
around the Tuwaitha nuclear facility near Baghdad and encouraged people to
swap them for their radioactive ones, contaminated with uranium
“yellowcake”.
Despite a US$3 a barrel offer from the US Army, many in the community have
retained the contaminated containers. Of the 500 barrels looted from the
nuclear site since the war, about 150 are still unaccounted for. A new
barrel costs US$15.
The affected people are not organised criminals but the poorest of the poor,
living in chronic poverty after years of neglect and abuse at the hands of
Saddam’s regime and a decade of crippling sanctions. We hope that by
offering new barrels specifically designed for water storage that we can
return the last of the contaminated barrels to the US military for
safe-keeping inside the Tuwaitha site.
[To read more]
http://www.greenpeace.org/news/details?item_id=288792
(Greenpeace International homepage)
http://www.greenpeace.org/homepage/
-U.S. Colonel Admits 500 Tons of D.U. Were Used in Iraq
Dear friends,
Midori at the ‘Children of the Gulf War’ photo exhibition UK tour writing.
Following article came from Scoop.co.nz dated on 5th of May. Jay Shaft from
the ‘Coalition For Free Thought In Media’ interviewed with an anonymous U.S.
Special Operations Command Colonel. The U.S. Colonel said ‘ I am aware of at
least 500 tons of D.U. munitions that were used by combined coalition
forces’. 500 tons of D.U.!! are much more than the last time. Officially
said the D.U. munitions were used 230 tons during the last Gulf War 1991.
If you don’t want such an email from me, please let me know. I will remove
your email address from my mailing list.
Thank you,
Midori
--
Midori Fujisawa
the ‘Children of the Gulf War’ photo exhibition UK tour
http://www.chimerafilms.co.uk/children.html
----------------------------------------
(Please spread it!)
1) U.S. Colonel Admits 500 Tons of D.U. Were Used in Iraq
By Jay Shaft - Coalition For Free Thought In Media -
5 May 2003 Scoop.co.nz
2) U.S. Colonel/ I wrote the article, enough slander!
BY Jay Shaft / editor CFTM
Fri May 9, 2003
----------------------------------------
1) U.S. Colonel Admits 500 Tons of D.U. Were Used in Iraq
By Jay Shaft - Coalition For Free Thought In Media -
5 May 2003 Scoop.co.nz
http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0305/S00050.htm
In three separate interviews a U.S. Special Operations Command Colonel
admitted that the U.S. and Great Britain fired 500 tons of D.U. munitions
into Iraq.
He has also informed me that the G.B.U.-28 BLU 113 Penetrator Bunker Buster
5000 pound bomb contains D.U. in the warhead. Until now, as far as I know,
the materials used to make the warhead of the G.B.U-28 have remained
shrouded in mystery.
He also admitted that privately the Pentagon has acknowledged the health
hazards of D.U. for years.
He asked to remain unnamed for obviously apparent safety reasons, and so
that he may remain a valuable source of information. (I will admit that I
will jealously guard his identity to keep him as a source.)
I have verified his identity and that his information is mostly accurate.
Some things I could not verify due to top secret classifications of certain
weapons.
The following is a transcript of questions I asked him. I will refer to him
as U.S.C. from here on.
J.S.: I understand you are a Colonel in the U.S. military, is that right?
U.S.C.: You are correct; I work for the U.S. Special Operations Command
attached to Central Command. My job is to plot coordinates for targets and
decide what is the best way to destroy the target.
I have a large network of analysts at my disposal to analyze each target and
figure out what weapons would best destroy it.
J.S.: Do you know how much D.U. was just used in Iraq, and what types of
munitions were used?
U.S.C.: Yes I am aware of at least 500 tons of D.U. munitions that were used
by combined coalition forces. I also know that many cities were heavily
bombarded with D.U. munitions.
J.S.: 500 tons? Are you absolutely sure?
U.S.C.: Oh, most sure on that matter. I know it was a little over 500 tons,
but you can round off your figures to the nearest hundred tons (chuckles).
J.S.: What about the cities? Did you deliberately use D.U. on them?
U.S.C.: Let’s just say that we didn’t do anything to avoid using D.U. in
cities or heavily populated areas. I know that I selected some D.U. bunker
busters because of the fact that they have a high penetration factor. I used
D.U. weapons exclusively on some targets so as to ensure maximum damage on
those targets. You don’t want to just halfway destroy some targets, you want
maximum damage.
J.S.: Hold on here, I didn’t know that the Bunker Busters were D.U. How do
you know that? I have to make sure this is for real.
U.S.C.: Well the specs on the B.B.s are top secret, so good luck on
verifying it. To answer your question I will ask you one. How do you think
they can penetrate a steel hardened bunker with a bomb unit? There has to be
D.U. in the warhead or else you wouldn’t get the penetration of the target
that is buried underground.
J.S.: Oh I see your point. Well can you tell me which of the B.B.s have D.U.
warheads?
U.S.C.: Well.......... (long pause) I think I will tell you about one and
leave it at that. The G.B.U.-28(guided bomb unit) BLU 113B 5000 pounder is
capable of being fitted with a D.U. warhead and dropped. It is not solely a
D.U. warhead; they still use them with conventional non-D.U. warheads.
If you were watching T.V. and you saw any bombs hit there was an easy way to
tell if it was D.U.
If you saw all those little secondary white fires burning in the air in the
blast: that was D.U. burning off. D.U. burns with a whitish orange flame,
almost looks like a firework shell burning.
J.S.: Any other B.B.’s using D.U. warheads?
U.S.C.: I don’t think I’ll answer that, I’ve already said too much. Next
question!
J.S.: Back to the 500 tons of D.U., did the D.O.D. / Pentagon deliberately
target civilian areas? And if they did, why?
U.S.C.: I answered that already, but I will tell you that there were a lot
of Iraqi armored vehicles in and around most major cities. Our own tanks and
vehicles use D.U. penetrator rounds to destroy those enemy vehicles. We are
aware that over 100 tons of D.U. munitions were used in and around Baghdad,
but a lot more fighting went on around the Northern cities and Basra. We
knocked out over 20,000 different types of vehicles in Iraq, and even
shelled buildings in downtown Baghdad with D.U.
J.S.: The Pentagon knew this was happening? Did they try to stop it? You
know, because of the health risks of D.U. and the fact that we were supposed
to be liberating Iraq?
U.S.C.: They wanted complete destruction of any military vehicle in Iraq.
That was why you saw our vehicles shooting even the disabled and already
shelled vehicles. I have seen pictures of many vehicles with over 20 holes
in them. The objective was to make sure that there is no way that any
fighting force could ever use those vehicles in any way. We wanted to
decimate the Iraqi army and make sure they were never able to fight again. I
think we achieved that objective quite well, more so than we had hoped in
such a short amount of time.
This took an enormous amount of ammunition, mostly D.U. tipped 25mm, 30mm,
and 125mm penetrator rounds.
J.S.: What about the health risks that are associated with D.U.? Or do you
deny there are any?
U.S.C.: You are determined to get me to make a statement about the health
risks aren’t you?
J.S.: If you will, I want to see what the behind the scenes view of D.U. is
in the Pentagon.
U.S.C.: Well**** (long pause, followed by heavy profanity). Okay, I’ll give
you some dirt if that’s what you’re looking for. The Pentagon knows there
are huge health risks associated with D.U. They know from years of
monitoring our own test ranges and manufacturing facilities.
There were parts of Iraq designated as high contamination areas before we
ever placed any troops on the ground. The areas around Basra, Jalibah,
Talil, most of the southern desert, and various other hot spots were all
identified as contaminated before the war. Some of the areas in the southern
desert region along the Kuwaiti border are especially radioactive on scans
and tests.
One of our test ranges in Saudi Arabia shows over 1000 times the normal
background level for radiation. We have test ranges in the U.S. that are
extremely contaminated, hell they have been since the 80ç“ and nothing is
ever said publicly. Don’t ask don’t tell is not only applied to gays, it is
applied to this matter very heavily.
I know at one time the theory was developed that any soldier exposed to D.U.
shells should have to wear full MOP gear (the chemical protective suit). But
they realized that just wouldn’t be practical and it was never openly
discussed again.
J.S.: So the stories that they know D.U. is harmful are true?
U.S.C.: Yes, there is no doubt that most high level commanders who were
around during the 80ç“ know about it.
J.S.: So how do you feel about the fact that you exposed your own men to
D.U.?
U.S.C.: F**k you!! What do you know about my job? I did what I had to do to
take out the targets I was given. If it was necessary to use D.U., than I
put it in my target analysis reports. I didn’t actually fire the rounds
myself; I work in a remote office.
J.S.: So you’ll never have to worry about being exposed to D.U. huh? Very
brave.
U.S.C.: (lot’s of profanity) this interview is over with (more profanity,
followed by the phone slamming down)
I never did get to finish the third interview, but I think what I got out of
the colonel is very telling.
By his own admission, even knowing the dangers of D.U., it was used on major
Iraqi cities. Our own troops are being exposed to the areas that have been
highly contaminated, with no warning or attempt to protect them.
There were hundreds of tons of D.U. used in major population centers, by
troops following orders to completely destroy all Iraqi military vehicles
and buildings. This is the first time that D.U. has been used in heavily
populated areas.
A whole country was just contaminated again with no regards to the future
generations that will live there. The Tigris River irrigates all the crops
grown in that area of the world, and most livestock is raised with water and
crops irrigated from that river.
How many more babies will be born with birth defects? How many more children
will get cancer and die before they can ever live a productive life?
Thousands have been affected by D.U. used in the first Gulf War. Some
figures on the rate of cancer in Iraq showed a 300-500% increase in cancer
and related illnesses since then. Now the major population areas have been
highly contaminated, with no regard to any Iraqi’s future health.
We will have to wait and see what the cost of this action will be. It is
sure to be extremely high, and result in a huge amount of further suffering
and death.
- Jay Shaft, Editor: Coalition For Free Thought In Media
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/coalitionforfreethoughtinmedia
----------------------------------------
2) U.S. Colonel/ I wrote the article, enough slander!
BY Jay Shaft / editor CFTM
Fri May 9, 2003
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/du-watch/message/1854
Now, maybe we can discuss the article as it was actaully published. I am the
author of this article and did the interview with the U.S. Colonel. I have
been bombarded with hate mail ever since.
Since I did the interview I have talked to a few other high level officers
who also confirmed that D.U. is used in some B.B. warheads. I took a great
risk to print this article and am suffering greatly for it. I did not
realize the shitstorm this would start when I did the interview.
To be honest I wasn’t conducting an interview about D.U. I was doing an
interview about civilian casualties and the D.U. topic just came up after
the first interview. It took me over an hour to conduct the last interview,
and I was not going to use it. I was convinced to print it by a lot of
journalists who did not have the courage to use it themselves.
I have watched the tapes of B.B.s hitting and you can see a pyrophoric fire
after some of the hits in Baghdad. I saw just the type of burnoff you have
when D.U. hits a target. I saw it during the first Gulf War so I know what
it looks like.
If anyone has any problems with my interview, then talk to me. I keep geting
yelled at by so called “experts” but I had the balls to publish this after
being warned not to by D.I.S.
I am tired of getting hate mail telling me I was messing up the cause of
trying to ban D.U. I don’t see how this does any damage to anyone’s agenda
except for the Pentagon’s and the government.
Let the argument rage on. I will try to defend myself to the best of my
ability. (Jay Shaft, editor, C.F.T.M.)
-IRAQ WAR INTELLIGENCE:?@MoveOn.org
MoveOn Bulletin
Friday, July 4, 2003
Noah T. Winer, Editor
Subscribe online at:
http://www.moveon.org/moveonbulletin/
CONTENTS
1. Introduction
2. One Link
3. Niger Forgeries
4. Misrepresentation
5. Powell and Blix Have Their Doubts
6. Intelligence Sources
7. Impeachment
8. British and U.S. Inquiries
9. Ends Justify the Means
10. Misleader
11. Credits
12. About the Bulletin
------------------------------
INTRODUCTION
Arguing for the necessity of a pre-emptive attack on Iraq, U.S.
President George W. Bush and other administration officials cited
intelligence that Saddam Hussein’s government possessed weapons of
mass destruction (WMD) in violation of United Nations Security Council
resolutions.
Not only had Iraq manufactured chemical and biological weapons, the
administration contended, they had attempted to obtain materials for
nuclear weaponry. In one address, Bush said: “Intelligence gathered by
this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime
continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever
devised.”
Yet more than two months after Bush declared the end of major combat
operations in Iraq, no WMDs have been found. While he still insists
such weapons will be discovered, evidence mounts that his
administration’s drive for war was based on forged, inaccurate, and
deliberately misconstrued intelligence.
------------------------------
ONE LINK
No time for more? Read the New York Times’ Paul Krugman on the Bush
administration’s “denial and deception” to justify war in Iraq and why
Congress won’t confront these distortions.
http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0624-04.htm
------------------------------
NIGER FORGERIES
During the build-up to war, British and U.S. officials cited letters
indicating Iraq had attempted to obtain nuclear material from the
central African country of Niger. On March 7, shortly before the war
began, Mohamed ElBaradei, the director-general of the International
Atomic Energy Agency, declared the documents had proven to be
forgeries.
http://www.moveon.org/r?457
The C.I.A. had debunked the Niger documents long before Bush began
using them as evidence. The agency urged the State Department not to
cite the forged letters when challenging Iraq’s weapons declaration in
December.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2003-06-12-niger-usat_x.htm
In a March 17 letter to President Bush, U.S. Representative Henry
Waxman called upon the President to explain the situation. As he said,
“The two most obvious explanations—knowing deception or
unfathomable incompetence—both have immediate and serious
implications.”
http://www.house.gov/waxman/text/admin_iraq_march_17_let.htm
Rep. Waxman has prepared two excellent factsheets: “The Bush
Administration’s Use of the Forged Iraq Nuclear Evidence” and “What
Intelligence Officials Knew about the Forged Iraq Nuclear Evidence.”
http://www.house.gov/reform/min/inves_admin/admin_nuclear_evidence.htm
------------------------------
MISREPRESENTATION
The Observer reports that the two vehicles Bush and Blair claim are
mobile biological weapons labs are probably used to produce hydrogen
for artillery balloons.
http://www.moveon.org/r?458
A memo from Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity to President
Bush:
“What is at play here is a policy and intelligence fiasco of
monumental proportions.”
http://truthout.org/docs_03/050503D.shtml
------------------------------
POWELL AND BLIX HAVE THEIR DOUBTS
“[U.S. Secretary of State Colin] Powell’s team removed dozens of pages
of alleged evidence about Iraq’s banned weapons and ties to terrorists
from a draft of his speech, US News and World Report says today. At
one point, he became so angry at the lack of adequate sourcing to
intelligence claims that he declared: ‘I’m not reading this. This is
bullshit,’ according to the magazine.”
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,968581,00.html
UN chief weapons inspector Hans Blix, who retired on Monday:
“It is sort of fascinating that you can have 100 percent certainty
about weapons of mass destruction and zero certainty of about where
they are.”
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0623-10.htm
------------------------------
INTELLIGENCE SOURCES
>From the Washington Post:
“A still-classified national intelligence report circulating within
the Bush administration...portrayed a far less clear picture about the
link between Iraq and al Qaeda than the one presented by the
president....”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A19822-2003Jun21
“In this report we present the publicly available data that U.S. and
UK leaders chose to ignore in the pre-war debate.... The reason those
now searching for weapons are finding only traces, remnants, and
precursors is that previous policies of sanctions and UN weapons
inspection and destruction actually worked.”
http://www.fourthfreedom.org/php/t-d-index.php?hinc=Unproven.hinc
Investigative journalist Seymour Hersh on Rumsfeld’s new Office of
Special Plans. Populated with associates of the Project for the New
American Century, “the operation rivalled both the C.I.A. and the
Pentagon’s own Defense Intelligence Agency...as President Bush’s main
source of intelligence regarding Iraq’s possible possession of weapons
of mass destruction and connection with Al Qaeda.”
http://newyorker.com/fact/content/?030512fa_fact
>From The New Republic:
A former staff member of the Senate Intelligence Committee admitted,
“People [kept] telling you first that things weren’t right, weird
things going on, different people saying, ‘There’s so much pressure,
you know, they keep telling us, go back and find the right answer,’
things like that.”
http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20030630&s=ackermanjudis063003
------------------------------
IMPEACHMENT
John Dean, President Nixon’s White House counsel, says the case for
impeachment would be easy legally, but impossible politically:
“To put it bluntly, if Bush has taken Congress and the nation into war
based on bogus information, he is cooked. Manipulation or deliberate
misuse of national security intelligence data, if proven, could be ‘a
high crime’ under the Constitution’s impeachment clause. It would also
be a violation of federal criminal law, including the broad federal
anti-conspiracy statute, which renders it a felony ‘to defraud the
United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any
purpose.’”
http://writ.corporate.findlaw.com/dean/20030606.html
A superb interview with Dean from BuzzFlash:
“Impeachment is a political proceeding, of quasi-legal nature.
Republicans are not going to impeach their president. To the contrary,
it is very clear they would defend him.”
http://www.buzzflash.com/interviews/03/06/17_dean.html
------------------------------
BRITISH AND U.S. INQUIRIES
In the United Kingdom, Prime Minister Tony Blair is under fire for his
dossier alleging Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction. An
inquiry underway in the Parliament has heard devastating testimony
from former foreign secretary Robin Cook and former international
development secretary Clare Short, both of whom resigned over Blair’s
claim that Iraq was a “clear and serious threat.”
http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/story/0,12956,987816,00.html
An Associated Press report on the Congressional inquiry into the Bush
administration’s handling of pre-war intelligence.
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0626-10.htm
------------------------------
ENDS JUSTIFY THE MEANS
>From the Village Voice:
“New York Times columnist Thomas L. Friedman shrugged off WMD hype as
a necessary selling technique for Bush, arguing that we hit Hussein
‘because we could’ and that what matters is whether we succeed at
building a ‘progressive Arab regime.’ In other words, the ends justify
the means.”
http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0325/cotts.php
------------------------------
MISLEADER
As regular Bulletin readers may know, the Bulletin topics aren’t
necessarily part of current MoveOn campaigns. The issue of Iraq war
intelligence, however, is the focus of MoveOn’s “Misleader”
advertising campaign. Sign the petition to demand that Congress
establish an independent, bipartisan commission to investigate and
hold the President and his officials accountable if they manipulated
or fabricated intelligence to justify taking the country to war.
http://www.moveon.org/distortion/
------------------------------
CREDITS
Research team:
Leah Appet, Russ Juskalian, Kate Kressmann-Kehoe, Janelle Miau, Sarah
Parady, Kim Plofker, and Jesse Rhodes.
Editing team:
David Taub Bancroft, Nancy Evans, Judy Green, and Rita Weinstein.
------------------------------
ABOUT THE MOVEON BULLETIN AND MOVEON.ORG
The MoveOn Bulletin is a free email bulletin providing information,
resources, news, and action ideas on important political issues. The
full text of the MoveOn Bulletin is online at
http://www.moveon.org/moveonbulletin/ ; you can subscribe to it at
that address. The MoveOn Bulletin is a project of MoveOn.org.
MoveOn.org is an issue-oriented, nonpartisan, nonprofit organization
that gives people a voice in shaping the laws that affect their lives.
MoveOn.org engages people in the civic process, using the Internet to
democratically determine a non-partisan agenda, raising public
awareness of pressing issues, and coordinating grassroots advocacy
campaigns to encourage sound public policies. You can help decide the
direction of MoveOn.org by participating in the discussion forum at:
http://www.actionforum.com/forum/index.html?forum_id=223
- World’s Weather Extremely Abnormal: UN Agency
The Independent (UK)
03 July 2003
In an astonishing announcement on global warming and
extreme weather, the World Meteorological Organisation
signalled last night that the world’s weather is going
haywire.
In a startling report, the WMO, which normally produces
detailed scientific reports and staid statistics at the
year’s end, highlighted record extremes in weather and
climate occurring all over the world in recent weeks,
from Switzerland’s hottest-ever June to a record month
for tornadoes in the United States - and linked them to
climate change.
The unprecedented warning takes its force and
significance from the fact that it is not coming from
Greenpeace or Friends of the Earth, but from an
impeccably respected UN organisation that is not given
to hyperbole (though environmentalists will seize on it
to claim that the direst warnings of climate change are
being borne out).
The Geneva-based body, to which the weather services of
185 countries contribute, takes the view that events
this year in Europe, America and Asia are so remarkable
that the world needs to be made aware of it
immediately.
The extreme weather it documents, such as record high
and low temperatures, record rainfall and record storms
in different parts of the world, is consistent with
predictions of global warming. Supercomputer models
show that, as the atmosphere warms, the climate not
only becomes hotter but much more unstable. “Recent
scientific assessments indicate that, as the global
temperatures continue to warm due to climate change,
the number and intensity of extreme events might
increase,” the WMO said, giving a striking series of
examples.
In southern France, record temperatures were recorded
in June, rising above 40C in places - temperatures of
5C to 7C above the average.
In Switzerland, it was the hottest June in at least 250
years, environmental historians said. In Geneva, since
29 May, daytime temperatures have not fallen below 25C,
making it the hottest June recorded.
In the United States, there were 562 May tornadoes,
which caused 41 deaths. This set a record for any
month. The previous record was 399 in June 1992.
In India, this year’s pre-monsoon heatwave brought peak
temperatures of 45C - 2C to 5C above the norm. At least
1,400 people died in India due to the hot weather. In
Sri Lanka, heavy rainfall from Tropical Cyclone 01B
exacerbated wet conditions, resulting in flooding and
landslides and killing at least 300 people. The
infrastructure and economy of south-west Sri Lanka was
heavily damaged. A reduction of 20-30 per cent is
expected in the output of low-grown tea in the next
three months.
Last month was also the hottest in England and Wales
since 1976, with average temperatures of 16C. The WMO
said: “These record extreme events (high temperatures,
low temperatures and high rainfall amounts and
droughts) all go into calculating the monthly and
annual averages, which, for temperatures, have been
gradually increasing over the past 100 years.
“New record extreme events occur every year somewhere
in the globe, but in recent years the number of such
extremes have been increasing.
“According to recent climate-change scientific
assessment reports of the joint WMO/United Nations
Environmental Programme Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change, the global average surface temperature
has increased since 1861. Over the 20th century the
increase has been around 0.6C.
“New analyses of proxy data for the northern hemisphere
indicate that the increase in temperature in the 20th
century is likely to have been the largest in any
century during the past 1,000 years.”
While the trend towards warmer temperatures has been
uneven over the past century, the trend since 1976 is
roughly three times that for the whole period.
Global average land and sea surface temperatures in May
2003 were the second highest since records began in
1880. Considering land temperatures only, last May was
the warmest on record.
It is possible that 2003 will be the hottest year ever
recorded. The 10 hottest years in the 143-year-old
global temperature record have now all been since 1990,
with the three hottest being 1998, 2002 and 2001.
The unstable world of climate change has long been a
prediction. Now, the WMO says, it is a reality.
-North & South Korean/Japanese Kids’ drawings
Below is the info on an exhibition of drawings by North/South Korean children and Japanese children. This event is condected by a Tokyo-based NPO, Japan International Volunteer Center(JVC).
This exhibition is currently being run in North/South Korea, also.
2003 “Exhibition by friends in South/Norh Korean and Japan”
Time: July 9-16
Venue: Tokyo Jido Kaikan
Free of charge!
For more info, contact Sumiko Teranishi
e-mail:
Aoyama Yuka
Tuesday, July 01, 2003
-Alternative to Capitalism and Traditional Marxism: Parecon
By request to students of my media class at Hitotsubashi
PARECON
-Globalization and Privatisation: Tokaimura and British Rail
My students asked me about the connection between privatisation and globalization, so here is an article on the subject by Ralph Nader from a few years ago. He does not mention globalisation, although he does mention corporatization, but i think the concepts are related. Everything is profit driven at the expense pf people’s welfare and safety.
Business decisions
The problems with privatization are found in the Japanese nuclear leak and the British train wreck.
http://www.tokyoprogressive.org/~tpgn/globalization/nadar.html
Also see this on privatisation in Turkey
http://www.tokyoprogressive.org/~tpgn/globalization/25cagan2.html
Privatising Education
http://www.tokyoprogressive.org/~tpgn/index3.files/dencity/glob-privedc.html
Other links on globalization
http://www.tokyoprogressive.org/~tpgn/index3.files/globalizationfs.html
Global Economics
http://www.zmag.org/CrisesCurEvts/Globalism/GlobalEcon.htm
