Tuesday, May 22, 2007

s

s


Thursday, May 03, 2007

Chinese version: 中国語:日本個人存款資助政府海外"援助"計畫  JAPANESE ODA fr

| | | | | | | | | |

(編輯按: 此文作者為 shioyama)

這個關係網令 人難以致信: 由日本海外發展援助計劃下的一個政府 "援助" 計劃, 一個被稱為財政投融資(fiscal Investment and Loan Program FILP)的項目, 把資金從日本市民的私人儲蓄戶口, 退休保障基金, 保險和公積金等, 引導到一些第三世界, 如印尼等地, 進行 "發展" 援助. 這些所謂的 "援助" 計劃, 在過去幾年投資在 gargantuan 水力發電廠, 以開發鋁礦, 以供應日本市場. FILP 的資金, 亦被投放到世銀 World Bank 和國際貨幣基金 IMF, 這些機構亦會貸款發展中國家.

這篇文章是根據一個於日本英國推廣公平貿易的公司的雙月刊 People tree內一篇文章寫成, 這篇文章於上月以日文出版, 上星期二於 gyaku 這個雙語網上媒體中被翻成英文.

People tree 這篇文章的研究由田中優負責, 他是一個日本的環保份子, 亦是一個非謀利的銀行 Mirai Bank 的總裁. 這間銀行的設立正正是為了回應主流銀行於 FILP 這類 "發展" 計劃中的角色, 它為日本市民提供一些另類的存款服務. Tanaka 於 1990 年代就曾接觸 FILP 的計劃, 處理鋁罐回收再造的計畫.

文章中提到:

在 1989 年, 1公斤的鋁罐可以賣得 100 日元, 到 1995 年, 價格下跌到 30 日元. 此外, 從印尼等地輸入的新鋁罐, 其價格比起由回收鋁罐再造的低質鋁罐更便宜, 因為回收涉及人力的投資. 因為價格如此底, 追求利潤的企業當然不會買回收的鋁, 亦正正如此, 日本的回收業一直沒有發展. 同樣的情況不單在鋁回收, 亦發生在其他的回收業, 如廢紙回收.

市民的私人存款投放於這些 "援助" 計畫, 不單使發展中國家陷入債務危機, 亦令日本的環保團體難以落實其理念. 同時, 在印尼, 因為要以水壩發電以生產鋁材, 印尼的平民百姓亦要回對這些 "援助" 造成的苦果:

雖然, 名義上說日本給予印尼發展援助, 可以興建水壩的費用其實是政府之間的貸款. 這個計畫的貸款額達 450億日圓. 水壩發的電, 近99%用於生產鋁, 1%供市區用. 所以, 即使水壩工程完成, 當地人都沒有電力供應, 可是, 因為興建水壩和工廠, 本地農民的農地, 森林和家園卻受到破壞, 生活完全被改變.

水壩所帶來的利益, 全部轉到生產鋁材上, 這些原材料又出口到國外, 以償還外債. 印尼的鋁材大部份以非常低廉的價錢賣給日本企業, 用以生產鋁罐, 窗框和車呔. 因為印尼的水壩, 日本的消費者可以享用很平宜的鋁產品.

可是, 絕大部份的日本市民不知道, FILP的計畫把所有的日本人都拖進計畫中, 其投資卻是一個個踐踏人權和破壞環境的項目. 而這些項目的決策權卻落在少數人的手中:

銀行業中有約13萬人從事金融工作, 他們透過股票投資活動, 決定1,300萬日本人的存款流向. 試想像 0.1%的人, 卻做出了一些會影響全日本以至全世界的決定, 這些金錢又往往投資在一些會破壞我們的未來的項目.

文章指出, 市民於郵政局和銀行的私人存款, 甚至間接地流到美軍的軍事活動中:

因為預算所限, 美國想盡辦法要找資金去支持其軍事活動, 政府發出債券. 而日本政府, 相較其他國家來說, 都更熱中於支持美國政府的籌款, 它收購了近 40% 的美國債券. 而這筆以政府短期證券為名, 投資在美國債券的錢, 正好來自一般市民於郵政局和銀行的存款. 換句說, 我們的銀行存款, 結果是資助了空襲伊拉克的炸彈.

現實雖令人沮喪, 但 Tanaka Yu 和一些在日本的朋友提出另類的出路, 他們推介一些有信用的機構, 使熱心的市民可以以其他的方式進行投資. 其中一家就是 Mirai Bank 和其他非謀利的銀行, Mirai Bank 是由 Tanaka Yu 自己建立的.

所謂的非謀利銀行是一些以公眾利益為依歸來營運的銀行. 在 1994 年, 7 個支持者, 拿出了 400萬日圓, 投資在一些團體和以社區為本的企業活動. 開始的時候, 人們覺得這種做法是發白日夢, 但到現在, 這銀行的總投資達 6 億日圓, 而投資規模達 1 億 6 千萬. 其投資項目從未出現過壞賬. 最近這些非謀利銀行的數目於全日本穩定增長.

這篇文章以公平貿易的原則, 指向一個未來的境願, 讓市民可以於不同的地方建立自己的非謀利銀行, 使他們可以真正地控制自己的金錢:

透過這些行動, 從我們的生活開始, 我們可以與貧窮的人口連結, 希望可以透過這過程創造一種新的關係, 一種不是建立在政府援助計畫的關係. 若我們學會小心地利用我們的金錢, 我們可以建立一個不需要金錢來操作的世界.

更詳細的資料請參考於 Gyaku 的英文全文


We need your donation to sustain this interlocals dialogue.

NPOバンク「未来バンク」理事長の田中優さんにお話をうかがいました。


Japanese personal savings fund development loan program (from GYAKU)

Japanese personal savings fund development loan program

Founded in 1995, with operations in Japan and Britain, People Tree is an ecological fashion company that works with 70 fair trade producer partners in 20 developing countries to help marginalized communities use fair trade to escape from poverty. Affiliated with the Japan-based NGO Global Village founded in 1989 by environmental activist Safia Minney, People Tree sells its Fair Trade products to over 600 Fair Trade shops throughout Japan, Britain and Italy.

Within Japan, People Tree publishes a biannual 106-page catalogue promoting its latest fashion lines, clothing, accessories, and other fair trade products. The first few pages of this catalogue are devoted to reports on issues related to fair trade: topics such as human rights, social justice, the environment, and international development.

The following is a translation by gyaku of a report which appeared in Japanese in the Spring/Summer edition of the People Tree catalogue (publication date: March 1, 2007). The article describes the research of Tanaka Yu, environmental activist and chief director of the NPO bank "Mirai Bank", exposing a web of connections by which money from Japanese private citizens' savings accounts is used by Japan's Official Development Assistance (ODA) Program to finance yen-denominated loans to third-world countries such as Indonesia. The majority of Japanese people, as well as most foreigners living in Japan, know nothing about this "assistance", which is allocated to ODA loans on their behalf under the name of Fiscal Investment and Loan Program (FILP, in Japanese "Zaisei Touyuushi"/財政投融資).

In the article, Tanaka Yu explains that, rather than "assisting" third-world countries, this financial assistance in fact tramples over human rights, finances wars, and destroys the environment. Within Japan, alternative financial institutions have emerged in response to the involvement of mainstream banks in these kinds of "development" programs. Examples of such NPO banks are Mirai Bank in Tokyo (focusing on financing environmental projects), Hokkaido NPO Bank (focusing on development within Hokkaido) and Community Youth Bank Momo in the Tokai Region (focusing on sustainable community development).

For more information, see People Tree's English-language website, and the original Japanese version. There is also a short summary in English at interlocals which has also been translated into Chinese.


The connections between developmental assistance and Japanese savings accounts

Financial assistance that we believe to be for the benefit of developing nations in fact plunges these countries deep into debt, while destroying the natural environment within Japan. The source of this financial assistance, moreover, is your very own money. How are we to respond to these facts? In today's article, we speak with Tanaka Yu, chief director of the NPO bank "Mirai Bank," about the circumstances surrounding developmental assistance and what we can do, using our own money, to change this situation.

Japan's Official Development Assistance (ODA), increasing suffering in the world's Developing Nations

Financed through Japan's Official Development Assistance (ODA) Program, construction of the gargantuan Asahan Dam on the island of Sumatra, Indonesia, was completed in 1984. The Asahan Dam, however, was not constructed with the aim of supplying energy to the citizens of Indonesia, but rather, under the pretext of developmental assistance, was built to enable the import of aluminium from Indonesia to Japan. The price of extracting aluminium ore domestically in Japan, a country scarce in natural resources, had steadily increased due to rising energy production costs. The project originated in efforts to escape these costs by shifting production to cheaper developing nations.

Nominally donated as developmental aid, construction expenses were in fact financed by means of yen-denominated government credits ― in other words, a loan to Indonesia. At the time, this amounted to a loan of 45 billion yen. Of the energy produced by the dam, roughly 99% was directed to aluminium production, with the remaining 1% flowing to urban areas. Even after completion of the dam, villages in the area for a long time remained without access to electrical power. To make space for the dam and the construction of factories, fields belonging to the local inhabitants were razed, forests chopped down, and lives forever changed.

The benefits of the electricity produced by the dam went entirely to the production of aluminium, with all products exported to repay loans. The majority of this aluminium was bought by Japanese corporations at low prices, used to produce things like drink cans, window frames and car wheels. Thanks to this dam constructed in Indonesia, Japanese consumers were able to obtain new products made of aluminium at very cheap prices. This was the scheme.

The market price of aluminium later decreased sharply, and even now Indonesia continues to suffer without end in sight, trapped in deep debt. In January, 2006, Indonesian Vice President Jusuf Kalla argued that Indonesia should not receive any more of Japan's developmental assistance, which overemphasizes loan-based donations from which Indonesia cannot not derive any benefit.

The ODA is the root cause of Japan's garbage problem!?

On the other hand, speaking of problems facing Japan, garbage comes up as a major one. The Japanese people have worked hard to separate and recycle their garbage. Tanaka Yu explains that the original spark which drew him to community activism was his involvement in recycling programs. In order to raise funds for groups such as the Junior Sports-Club Association and the Children's Club (Kodomo-Kai), he participated in clean-up operations which involved collecting empty aluminium cans.

However, whereas in 1989, 1 kilogram of aluminium cans could be sold for 100 yen, by 1995 this figure dropped to only 30 yen. Moreover, in terms of market value, the new aluminium cans arriving from places like Indonesia were consistently cheaper than the low-quality cans made of recycled alumium, which required a significant investment of labour for collection. Due to this cheaper cost, profit-seeking corporations had no reason to buy recycled aluminium. It is for this reason that the recycling movement never progressed in Japan. It would seem that this reasoning applies not only to the production of aluminium, but also to the production of other products such as paper.

As a result of this dam's construction, Indonesia suffers under debt while Japan struggles with a garbage problem. Who has really been helped? Who has benefitted from low-cost aluminium for construction work? In fact, the only ones who have benefitted have been the world's corporations, particularly Japan-based ones, who have gotten their hands on the profits they wanted.

According to Tanaka Yu, caused by the actions of Japan's ODA, developing countries all over the world have been trapped in debt hell. Of total donations granted by Japan's ODA, 55% take the form of yen-denominated loans; in other words, this financial assistance demands repayment. What makes this figure so conspicuous is that nowhere else in the world is there anything like it. At present, the sum total of ODA loans to the 48 countries ranked as the poorest in the world exceeds the sum total of donations to these same countries.

Obstructing solutions to the garbage problem while pluging the world's developed nations into debt hell, can we really call this assistance? Of course, there are many cases of ODA operations that have been beneficial. And yet, why then does the ODA continue these assistance programs ― assistance that causes developing nations to suffer while reaping great profits for corporations?

Why does the Japanese government press for repayment?

One question that arises is: why does the Japanese government not give financial assistance in the form of donations, the way that other countries do? The answer is that the Japanese government is investing your money in these assistance programs. The name of this fund is "Fiscal Investment and Loan Program" (FILP). These funds come from resources such as postal savings accounts, employee pensions, government pension plans, and postal life insurance, that is, the very savings that we all invest in without much attention. This money of ours is then used to fuel mounting problems created by the ODA, bringing suffering to the people of developing countries.

On top of this, aside from bilateral cooperation agreements, the FILP funds are also used to finance the World Bank and IMF (International Monetary Fund), organizations which impose further debt programs on these developing countries. When developing countries find themselves financially strapped, these institutions then implement Structural Adjustment Programs (SAP), forcing governments to re-allocate funds from education, welfare, and health toward debt repayment. They are forced furthermore to produce crops exclusively for export, and are payed only in foreign currency. Local people starve and die while only a few feet away crops rich in produce are harvested for export to developed countries. The topic of Fair Trade occasionally comes up in this context, touching on for example the production of cacao beans from Africa and bananas from the Philippines, to name a few.

Things we can all do right now: NPO Bank and Fair Trade
Today's problems and the picture of the future

Through our savings and without being conscious of it, we are all of us involved with, and investing in, various social problems. Roughly 130,000 people working in the finance departments of banking institutions, via investment in the stock exchange, make decisions that determine where the savings of 130 million of Japanese people will end up going. The thinking of just 0.1% of the total population steers the future course of Japan and of the whole world, while the money invested goes to creating a series of problems that destroy our own future.

Where then should we deposit our money so that we can arrive at the brighter future that we hope for? First of all, directly invest your money in projects or companies that engage in social activities and that you can personally trust. If you don't have any investment know-how, then deposit your money in financial institutions which themselves invest in such kinds of projects.

An example of such a financial institution is "Mirai Bank" organized by Tanaka Yu, with whom we have been speaking today, as well as other NPO Banks of its kind. NPO Banks are banks that are run by and operate in the interest of the general public. In 1994, a group of only 7 supporters put forward 4 million yen and started invested this money in groups and enterprises engaging in community-based actvities. While at first people spoke of the project as a kind of pipe dream, total investment in this bank currently amounts to over 600 million yen. Total investment by this bank, moreover, has reached a scale of 160 million yen, without a single case of bad debt. Recently, NPO Banks of this kind have steadily increased in number, spreading across the whole country.

Next, when thinking about where your money goes, it is important to stop and consider what it is you are buying. Through the action of buying something, we are choosing both the people who make the item and the company that sells it. In these cases, please choose fair trade products, goods that are produced via a process that takes into consideration human rights and environmental issues.

In the current age, money connects the whole world. Words and ideas that transform the world, however, are unfortunately nearly non-existant. If you are worried about war, or about environmental destruction, think carefully when you spend your money. If we demand high profits, then businesses that make money now will get their hands on our money and investment it in ways that will destroy the Earth of tomorrow. Futher, if we demand cheap prices, corporations will trample over the environment and over human rights to suppress costs and produce lower-priced commercial goods.

It has only been a little over ten years since NPO banks and fair trade businesses began operating in Japan. These are still very new systems, and there are many issues that remain to be solved. For example, due to the fact that little consideration has been put into the nonprofit-based financing mechanism of NPO banks, these banks are forced to register themselves in the same way as do consumer banking instutions, according to the "Finance Industry Law". However, when these consumer banking instutions cause social problems, it is the NPO banks who deal with the repercussions.

If nothing changes, new NPO banks will not be able to open, and heavy administrative costs will prevent operations from continuing. This despite the fact that NPO banks do not collect funds illegally, far from it: their interest rates on loans are extremely low, and the groups involved do not even make a profit. For this reason, NPO banks across the country have started thinking about ways to bond together and support each other. The goal is to make it possible for citizens, outside of the context of finance industry laws, to autonomously manage non-profit banks.

Were this goal to be realized, it would become possible for any person in any area to open their own non-profit bank. By having control over their own money, people would be able to choose their own future. In this way, it would become possible to support the management and low-interest financing of businesses which advance fair principles of trade, rather than investing in corporations that maximize profits while trampling over the poor.

It is a different kind of feeling to buy a fair trade product. When buying a product in the usual way, subjects of conversations typically focus on the low price of a product or what its brand name is; in the case of fair trade shopping, however, price and brand name are irrelevant. In their place, thoughts about the person who made the product come to mind. This very different feeling is what we need to bring to all corners of our everyday lives. Once this goal is realized, it will become possible for everyone to experience this novel sensation of richness and wealth. Through this type of operation, starting from our everyday lives, we each become joined to the poor people who live amidst poverty. The hope is that in this process we can create a new kind of relationship, one that is not based on governmental assistance programs. If we can learn to spend our money carefully, we can build a world that does not need money.


Some things to think about

Our money, trampling over human rights

Thanks to the success of White Band anti-poverty campaigns, many people have taken an interest in the problem of global poverty. However, the number of people who actually understand the root causes of such poverty remains very small. What drives these people into poverty, trampling over their right to live a happy life, is the forceful demand to repay the loan ― much like those of the loan shark ― given to them in the name of assistance. Using financial resources from postal savings accounts, more money has been leant in this way to the poorest countries of the world by Japan than by any other country. If Japan had freed these countries of their debt, they would never have become as poor as they are today. It is still not too late. If Japan stops demanding repayment of these loans, countless lives could be saved.

Our money, financing wars

Money from postal savings accounts and bank accounts of Japanese citizens indirectly covers the military expenses of American war operations. Due to its budget deficit, the U.S. is struggling to squeeze out enough money to cover these military expenses. Government bonds are sold to raise funds. Supporting this fund-raising, at a scale larger than any other country in the world, is the Japanese government, which bears the costs for close to 40% of all bonds issued by the U.S. The source of funds for investment in these bonds, referred to under the title of "Short-term Government Securities," comes from money taken out of the bank accounts and postal savings accounts of ordinary citizens. Our bank deposits are used to finance the delivery of bombs to be dropped on Iraq.

Our money, destroying the environment

In 2006, despite fierce opposition, government policy in Hokkaido led to the sell-off, at a price of next to nothing, of sacred land (Nibutani) belonging to the local native Ainu population to the national government, to be used for a hydro-dam project. The dam's industrial water service, however, did not sell as much as a single drop of water to companies or citizens, but instead hoarded large amounts of money from loans. Following its completion, it didn't take long before the dam was filled with sediment, leading eventually to more money being spent in order to flood more land, the most fertile in the area. The funds to carry out this operation came from our postal savings accounts. What is left of the large debts incurred by our country will also be financed with money from our savings and through the taxes that we pay. The truth is, in fact, that the funds for all such environmentally destructive public projects come from the same source.


Profile of Tanaka Yu

30 Ways to Eliminate World Poverty by Tanaka Yu
30 Ways to Eliminate Poverty

Beginning with regional recycle programs and community activism against nuclear power generation, Tanaka Yu became increasingly involved in various NGO activities related to environmental, economic, and anti-war themes. Currently chief director of the Mirai Bank business association, Tanaka is also a board member of the Japan International Volunteer Center and of Sokuon-Net, as well as an advisor to ap bank. Tanaka Yu is also a part-time lecturer at Fukui Prefectural University, Rikkyo University and the Wako University Graduate School. He has written many books, most recently "30 Ways to Eliminate World Poverty" (sekai kara mazushisa wo nakusu 30 no houhou/世界から貧しさをなくす30の方法), published by Godo-shuppan.


被爆者、我人生: 副・プロデユーサーをさがします!



被爆者、我人生
デビッド・ロスハウザー(制作中)映画

ーーーー>副・プロデユーサーをさがします!<-----
(他アドヴァイスもおねがいします)



Email:

英語はベストなんだけど、翻訳をできる人もいる。


命は尊い贈り物だ。脅かされることなく生きていけるように。
プレス・リリース (SAMPLE VIDEO)
http://www.memoryproductions.org/ja/

David Rothauser
MEMORY Productions
39 Fuller Street
Brookline, MA 02446
617 232-4150
www.memoryproductions.org

よろしくお願いいたします。



副・プロデユーサーの責任:

*    体重、背丈が中西に似た男優を探す。台詞不必要。

中西さんは今年まで一番若い被爆者であり。残念ながら白血病で死にました。

*    予算の$180,000-$300,000を集めることを補助する。
―予算集め、プロダクション職員、ロケーション、通訳、編集者、配布、旅行、宿泊の手配、等を探す。
― 日本在住でなくてよいが、プロダクションを促進することができなければいけない。理想的には日本在住がよい。
― プロダクション職員を探す。

*    カメラマン:熟練カメラマンで、日本の田舎を知っている人。脚本に
従って屋内でも屋外でも撮影できる。    場面は主役の二人(被爆者の老人と女の子)が、昼間と夜に歩いているシーンである。もうひとつは、雨が降っ
ているシーンを撮る。対話はごく少ない。希望者に脚本を送ることも可能。

*    録音(サウンド)オペレーター:周囲の音、会話を上手にピックアップ
出来る。

  * 照明:ムードを上手に捕えることができる。照明の道具は最小限度で     旅行できること。

*    ロケーションを確保する。広島、長崎、その他日本の田舎。 韓国や
アメリカのシーンも考えられる。
 
*    通訳を探す。日本語・英語、韓国語・英語、中国語・英語。

*    プロダクションのアシスタント (二人)を探す。責任は、スクリプト、対話、衣装、、カメラ・アングル・雑音、ライテイング、等。

*    キャストや、職員たちの旅行、宿泊のアレンジメントをする。

*    外からの電話や、毎日の撮影の準備などを調整し、デイレクターとプロダクション・マネージャーのサポートする。

*    プロダクション・マネージャーを探す。プロダクション・マネージャーは日々の旅行、宿泊、道具、供給物の管理をする。プロダクション・マネー
ジャーは毎日の実績を記録し、プロダクション・アシスタントを監督する。

*    販売先のリサーチ:プロデユーサーと協力して国内、あるいは世界的販売先の可能性を探す。 フィルムが完成したとき、世界ツアーも計画
する。

*    編集者を探す。被爆者について知識があり、想像力と、最新のテクノロジ―の知識のある人。

* メークアップの職員を探す。特別なメークアップと通常のメークアップ
    の技術を持っている人。


追加事項:

希望者に脚本を送ることが出来る。脚本は50-60%撮影済み。ただし未だ編集してない。

このフィルムを完成するには、私はもう一度日本に行く必要がある。

副・プロデユーサーは、予算から支払いされる。予算が決まるまではボランテイアである。予算が決まるまでは最低必要金は、私が立て替える。予算が決まっ
たら、副・プロデユーサーは、決まった報酬を受ける。もし予算が増えた場合は、副・プロデユーサーに、仲介料として、予算の約10%を払う。

インデイ・メデイアのネットワーク内の人物でも才能があり、経験があればオーケー。テレビのプロダクションに使う器具を使える人を望む。


Hibakusha, Our Life To Live
A film (in progress) by David Rothauser
PRESS RELEASE:http://memoryproductions.org/


David Rothauser
MEMORY Productions
39 Fuller Street
Brookline, MA 02446
617 232-4150
www.memoryproductions.org



LOOKING FOR A CO PRODUCER

Also anyone with good advice.

PLEASE respond in English or Japanese to
Email:


(He has someone to translate)


Co-Producer  Duties

·    Find an experienced actor (physically close to Nakanishi’s height
and weight)

NAKANISHI SAN died recently od Leukemia.


. No speaking required.
·    Assist in raising a COMPLETION budget…$180,000-300,000 dollars
Assist with finding funding, production personnel, locations,
interpreters, editor, distribution, travel and lodging, etc.
Doesn’t need to be in Japan. But be able to facilitate the production
as if he/she were in Japan. It would be best if they are in Japan.
Find Production Personnel
·    Camera Operator: a camera person who is very experienced and
knows the JAPANESE COUNTRYSIDE. Needs to be able to shoot indoor and
outdoor scenes according to a script and storyboard. Scenes involve
Day time and Day-for- Night shooting of the two main characters (an
older hibakusha and a little girl) walking.  There will be one scene
where we will create rain. I will be happy to send them a script if
they are interested.  Scenes include minimal dialogue.
·    Sound Operator… should be good at capturing ambient sound as well
as clear dialogue.
·    Lighting Person… should be creative with mood lighting and be
able to travel light with a minimum of lighting equipment.
·    Secure locations…need to film in Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Japanese
countryside, maybe Korea and additional scenes in America.
·    Find Language interpreters… Japanese-English, Korean and Chinese-
English.
·    Secure Production Assistants…Usually two people who are
responsible for script, dialogue, costume, camera angles, sound
interference and lighting continuity. Assist in making Travel and
Lodging Arrangements for Cast and Crew. Also assist with coordinating
incoming phone calls and daily shooting preparation. They work closely
with the Director and the Production Manager.
·    Secure a Production Manager… Production Manager should arrange
travel and lodging schedules, secure equipment and supplies on a daily
basis, maintains a daily list of  achievements and supervises
Production Assistants.
·    Research Distribution possibilities…Co-Producer works closely
with Producer to locate Distribution possibilities nationally and
internationally. Helps organize world tour of completed film.
·    Secure an Editor…Locate an editor who is familiar with the
subject matter and is creative in their working with state of the art
technology.
·    Secure a Make-up person…a person who has experience with special
effect make-up as well as standard make-up.

INFORMATION

 I will be happy to send  a script if you are interested. The film is
50-60% shot--not yet edited."

As the Director I need to be in Japan one more time to complete
filming.
I need to make major decisions on the spot.
The Co-Producer would be paid from the budget. Their work would be
voluntary until we have a budget.
 But I could cover the co-producer's basic expenses until there is a
budget.
Then he/she would be paid a set fee. If they raise the budget alone
they would also be
 paid a finder's fee--about 10% of the budget.

Non professionals within the IndyMedia network might be okay if they
are very talented and experienced.
 We need experienced people using PROFESSIONAL EQUIPMENT.
That means Television Production quality equipment.


THANK YOU VERY MUCH


    Email:

 


Page 1 of 1 pages
Last 20 Media Entries: Democracy Now, Video, MP3

Last 20 News Articles: Japan, World and 日本語
Podcast RSS

View calendar

Add an event



Copyleft 1997-2007
tokyoprogressive dot org
All opinons are those of the original authors

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for by copyright law in several countries.  The material on this site is distributed without profit