7 August 2003
Over the rainbow by Michael Bronski
Gay-movement organizers obsessed with fighting for same-sex marriage seem to have forgotten their roots in a quest for a more liberated world, one they shared with feminists who viewed marriage as hopelessly patriarchal.

-Continuation of Police Raid on HS Teachers’s House

In the spirit of Gandhi and Martin Luther King, we must find ways to resist illegitimate authority. And yes, in Japan, things arer becoming worse and worse and the police are used by school officials to stifle debate and dissent.  Witness the recent case of a teacher who is the viictim of heavy-handed, Gestapo-like police tactics in: Police raid retired teacher who raised flag, anthem ruckus.  (22 May).....

CONTINUATION

... Here is a story from a few months earlier,
Freedom is flagging in Japan’s public-school system, which suggests that 90 percent of the graduating students at Itabashi High School support their couragious teacher.

Meanwhile, on May 18 the Japan Times published an article by Hisahiko Okazaki, ultranationalist, saying that the deaths of SDF soldiers would be a “noble sacrifice” on behalf of U.S.-Japan relations.  (This article is mysteriously missing from their online version).  This is just more reason to connect the dots and see how police repression, forced patriotism, the throwing out of Article 9 and tacit support of U.S. killing in Iraq are linked to a backwards slide away from democracy for Japan.

Sunday, May 16, 2004

THE TERRIBLE AND STRANGE DEATH OF NICK BERG

The Terrible and Strange Death of Nick Berg

By James Conachy

The terrible death of Nick Berg in Iraq — beheaded in front of a video camera — has taken place in such strange and suspicious circumstances that it raises deeply troubling questions. Among them is whether American agencies had a direct or indirect hand in the young man?fs murder.

Questions immediately arise from the timing and political consequences of his killing. At the height of a massive scandal engulfing the Bush administration, Berg?fs death has been exploited by the American government and the US media to launch a counter-offensive against the revelations of systematic US torture in Abu Ghraib and other Iraqi prisons. A wholesale attempt is being made to shift American and international public opinion away from the outrage over the criminal character of the US occupation of Iraq and behind the self-serving argument that American forces are needed in Iraq to prevent the country descending into barbarism and chaos.

Were Berg?fs murderers being directly paid by the American government, they could not have performed a more timely service for the Bush White House.

Berg?fs killing was carried out in the name of al-Qaeda-aligned Jordanian terrorist Abu Musaab al-Zarqawi. Whoever is operating in the name of Zarqawi, they have a proven record of provocative actions that have only helped to prop up the American occupation of Iraq. On February 9, amid signs that the majority Iraqi Shiite population was on the verge of joining the armed resistance being fought mainly in Sunni Muslim areas, a letter was made public, allegedly authored by Zarqawi, calling for Sunnis to provoke a civil war with the Shiites. American officials used the letter to argue that their occupation was the only thing holding Iraq?fs religious groups apart. Several weeks later, on March 2, suicide bombings at Shiite mosques in Karbala and Baghdad were blamed on what the US now calls the ?gZarqawi network.?h

Contrary to the schema outlined by US officials and in Zarqawi?fs letter, the bulk of the Iraqi masses spurned sectarianism. The growing unity has been on display in mass demonstrations and joint struggle since the eruption of a Shiite uprising in early April. Even before the torture revelations, the US occupation of Iraq had crumbled into a morass of bloody reprisals against the Iraqi people and growing American casualties. Opposition has been steadily growing in the US and internationally.

The group who carried out the beheading of Berg and then ensured it was broadcast around the globe must have known that it would horrify American and world public opinion and assist the efforts at damage control in Washington.

Further questions are raised by the attempts of the US government to conceal or distort what it knew about Berg himself and the events leading up to his disappearance in Baghdad on April 10. Berg vanished in Iraq just 72 hours after being released from 13 days in US military custody and questioning by the FBI.

Berg has been described by his family and friends as adventurous. He had a limited knowledge of Arabic and an interest in obtaining reconstruction contracts in Iraq for the family telecommunications company, Prometheus Methods Tower Service. In December 2003 he travelled to Iraq and went home on February 1. Among the places the young man inquired for contract work was the Abu Ghraib prison—which he referred to as a ?gnotorious prison for army and political prisoners.?h He returned to Iraq in mid-March.

CBS News revealed yesterday that the young man had been on the FBI?fs books for at least two years. In 2002, he was interviewed as part of the investigations in the September 11 terror attacks, over the fact his computer password had been used by alleged al-Qaeda terrorist Zaccarias Moussaoui. According to Berg?fs family, the FBI was reportedly satisfied the password was obtained during a brief encounter on a bus, when Nick Berg had allowed an acquaintance of Moussaoui to use his computer.

On March 7, the pro-Bush website FreeRepublic.com published a list of ?genemies?h who were opposing the US occupation of Iraq. Among the names, taken from a public list of people who had endorsed a planned March 20 antiwar demonstration on the website of the group ANSWER, was Michael Berg—Nick?fs father—and the name of the Berg family company. Such information would be entered into the databases of US intelligence agencies as well.

Berg was seized on March 24, within one week of returning to Iraq, and held incommunicado without charges in a Mosul prison for unspecified ?gsuspicious activities.?h His parents in Philadelphia were visited by the FBI on March 31 and asked why their son was in Iraq. Berg reported being interviewed at least three times during his detention by FBI agents and asked whether he had constructed pipe bombs or had visited Iran. He was released on April 6 only after his family filed a federal court case against the US government the day before for illegal imprisonment. Dan Senor, the Coalition Provisional Authority spokesman in Iraq, claimed this week that Berg had never been detained by US forces, only by Iraqis. This has been exposed to be a lie. Berg?fs family has produced an email from Beth A Payne, a US consular official in Iraq, dated April 1. Payne wrote: ?gI have confirmed that your son, Nick, is being detained by the US military in Mosul… He was picked up approximately one week ago.?h The chief of the Iraqi police in Mosul has also publicly rejected the claim that Berg was detained by his command. He told a press conference on May 13: ?gThe Iraqi police never arrested the slain American. Take it from me… that such reports are baseless.?h

After his release, Nick Berg travelled to Baghdad. His family last heard from him on April 9, when he reported he was looking to leave Iraq via Kuwait as soon as it was safe enough. They have indicated Berg told them he was wary of trying to fly out to Jordan on the grounds it was too dangerous. At the time, much of Baghdad was in engulfed in heavy fighting. Large parts of the city, including the roadways leading to the airport, were under constant attack by the Iraqi resistance and Westerners and Japanese had been taken hostage by various groups.

The last alleged contact with Berg by a US official was on April 10. A State department spokesperson told CBS an American diplomat offered to arrange a flight for him to Jordan. He allegedly refused and restated his intention to travel to Kuwait. His hotel has reported he left early on April 10, saying he intended to be back within a few days. If the American government is to be believed, no US agency then took any further interest in his activities or well-being until it was apparent he had disappeared. No satisfying answers have been given to obvious questions. Were Berg?fs movements in Iraq being monitored by American intelligence? Why was he detained and on whose orders? Was he under surveillance after he was released on April 6? If he was, how did he come to be kidnapped in the centre of Baghdad? Throughout this week, Berg?fs father Michael has repeatedly denounced the Bush administration for complicity in his son?fs death. He told Boston radio station WBUR on Tuesday: ?g

[W]hat cost my son his life was the fact the US government saw fit to keep him in custody for 13 days without any of due process or civil rights and released him when they were good and ready. It goes further than Donald Rumsfeld. It?fs the whole Patriot Act, it?fs the whole feeling in this country that rights don?ft matter any more because there are terrorists about. Well in my opinion ?eterrorist?f is just another word like ?ecommunist?f or ?ewitch?f and it?fs a witchhunt and this whole administration is just representing something that is not America.?h

Yesterday, he told Philadelphia radio: ?gMy son died for the sins of George Bush and Donald Rumsfeld. This administration did this.?h He has also demanded to know whether ?git is true that al-Qaeda offered to trade my son?fs life for another person,?h as is alleged in the video-tape statement of Nick Berg?fs killers.

The issues being raised by Michael Berg point to the fact, that at best, the US authorities created the conditions in which his son could be kidnapped by extremists and killed.

The more disturbing possibility that arises from all the evidence that is known is that Berg?fs disappearance and subsequent killing was the work of US agencies or pro-US Iraqi factions. One month after he disappeared, Berg was murdered at the most opportune moment for the US government.

Anyone who believes it is unthinkable or outrageous to suggest that the American government would sanction having one of its citizens murdered to shore up its fortunes is underestimating the political situation.

The Bush administration and elements of the American military hierarchy, media and corporate establishment are indictable war criminals. They ordered, directed, propagated or have profited from a criminal war, in flagrant violation of international law. The year since the US-led invasion of Iraq has been marked by further war crimes and atrocities. For significant sections of the American ruling class, everything depends upon preventing opposition to the occupation of Iraq within the American and international working class from developing into a conscious movement for political and social change. To them, the life of 26-year-old Nick Berg would have meant nothing.

Some points to ponder about the berg_killing video;

# The speaker which the cIA identified as Al Zaraqwi but...the CIA and US military had said in April 2003 that Al Zaraqwi was killed in Falluja. Iraqi associates of Al Zaraqwi have also said he is dead. So, did Al Zaraqwi suddenly come alive again a year later??? Besides which, with those masks on, it is impossible to identify who the speaker is.

# The orange jumpsuit that Nick Berg is wearing in the video is a standard US-military issued prison uniform.

# The white plastic chair that Nick Berg is sitting on during the first part of the video is IDENTICAL to those used in the Abu Graib prison (where the USA has become so notorious recently for the torture and perverted and disgusting abuse of prisoners).

# Why didn’t Nick Berg struggle during the execution? Even the pain alone would’ve been enough to make him react, but he didn’t move at all. There was also not enough blood, and the human head contains 1.5 gallons of blood. Even after decapitation, there should’ve been a spurting geyser of blood from the arteries in the neck, but instead there was alomst nothing. The only conclusion from this is that Nick Berg was already dead.

# The screaming that was heard is easily recognized as a woman’s voice, and comes from off-camera as it was dubbed in later. Perhaps it was the young American woman seen in the Abu Graib torture photos; Pfc Lyndie England.

# The repeated “Allahu Akubars” during the beheading also come from off-camera and are obviously dubbed in, as none the men move their mouths, and the sound is wrong. Worse still for credibility, they are exact copies, repeated agan and again.

# During the line-up of the masked men, it can be clearly seen that some of the men have white-skin, not an arab’s darker skin tones. Also, all them are overweight.

# The video itself was released on some very anonymous “islamic websites” based on servers in Malaysia..but...investigations have already discovered that the video was originally uploaded from LONDON…

LET’S NOT FORGET WHAT THE VIDEO WAS MEANT TO DISTRACT US FROM...The systematic TORTURE and SEXUAL ABUSE of often innocent Iraqi people at a US-military-run prison in Baghdad.

Stories of the torture & abuse by US soldiers

“Iraqis are treated in a dehumanized way.” Issam al-Hammad said the Americans came to his village near al-Qaim on the Syrian border looking for his father, Abid Hammad al-Mahoosh, a major general in the disbanded Iraqi army.

He wasn’t there, so they took Issam and his three brothers, the youngest of them age 16. “We spent five and a half months in four detention centers,” Issam al-Hammad said.

Al-Hammad, who is in his late 20s, said they were beaten and given electrical shocks. “I was naked apart from my underpants and they poured water on my back and then electrified me with an electrical stick,” he said.

Several times American officers pointed a pistol at one of the brothers to force the others to talk, he said. “They told me if you don’t talk we will bring your mothers and sisters here,” al-Hammad said.

FATHER “DIED AFTER TORTURE”

The al-Hammad brothers showed a photograph of a body marked extensively with bruises and burns, which they said was their father, who surrendered to U.S. forces after his sons were detained.

“Our father handed himself to the Americans three days after we were arrested. For two months he was tortured, and when he died because of the torture they dropped his body at the front gate of a hospital and left him there,” Issam al-Hammad said.

The brothers said they had a hospital autopsy report stating their father died of a heart attack caused by extensive torture.

“We are not looking for compensation. We want to expose what happened to our father to the rest of the world and make sure other detainees won’t suffer like us,” al-Hammad said.

Najim Abdul-Majid, 45, a Baghdad shop owner detained with his 17-year-old son last August, said during interrogation his captors would chain him to the ceiling for three hours. “Beating and humiliation was the norm,” he said.

“Once they took me to watch my son being tortured with electricity. He was tied to a pole while two wires were dangled on his back,” he said.

Accused of storing explosive material, Abdul-Majid said he spent six months in Abu Ghraib prison before being released with an apology. His son was still in detention, he said.

-No to GM Wheat Thanks to Japanese Consumers

“Monsanto suspends development of herbicide resistant GM wheat
- Japanese consumer petition stops GM wheat”
NO! GMO Campaign
Director, Keisuke AMAGASA

On 10 May 2004, the Monsanto Company made an about-turn from previous strong
promotion of its new herbicide resistant (Roundup Ready) GM wheat variety to
announce that it was suspending further development. In the announcement,
the company stated that they would defer all further efforts to introduce
Roundup Ready wheat and that they would discontinue breeding and field level
research of the crop until such time that other wheat biotechnology traits
were introduced.

This announcement says that the company was suspending R&D and does not say
that it is withdrawing from the field, and also stated that it was not
withdrawing the applications for approval that have already been submitted.
This is effectively a setback for the company, and something close to a
declaration of withdrawal.

Monsanto applied for approval of the GM wheat variety simultaneously in the
USA and Canada in 2002, and was working for a start to cultivation in 2005.
However, strong resistance from both producers and consumers all over the
world has made commercialisation all but impossible. Especially the strong
opposition from the largest markets, Japanese and Korean consumers, to GE
wheat has caused panic to spread among the producers of North America.

From 21 to 28 March 2004, a group of six Japanese consumer representatives,
including representatives from the No! GMO Campaign, visited Canada and the
USA to present a petition to opposing the GM wheat to the Canadian federal
government and a state government of the USA (North Dakota). The petition
was signed by 414 organizations representing over 1.2 million Japanese
people. It is thought that this visit and the submission of the petition had
a very strong effect on public and official thinking in the two countries.

Effectively this means that Japanese consumer pressure has been successful
in forcing Monsanto to suspend development of both GM rice and GM wheat. The
company has tried to sell its GM crops to the world using its financial and
political power, but it has now been shown that if Japanese consumers form
strong links with and fight alongside people all over the world they will
not be beaten.

INFO: url=http://www.no-gmo.org/

Also:

BITE BACK: WTO HANDS OFF OUR FOOD!
Sign the Citizens’ Objection to the WTO!
http://www.bite-back.org

George Bush is using the World Trade Organisation (WTO) to force-feed you
genetically modified food! You can help stop them: BITE BACK!

Biotech companies have invested billions into genetically modified foods
that nobody needs and nobody wants. Such products (known as GMOs) take away
consumer choice, make farmers dependent on big business and undermine food
security in developing countries. Nobody knows what risks they pose to
people’s health and the environment.

To force GMOs into global markets, George Bush has filed a legal dispute at
the WTO, accusing the European Union of blocking trade by restricting GMOs.
If successful, not only will the EU have to accept genetically modified food
and farming but so will the rest of the world.

Stop them: BITE BACK and sign the Citizens’ Objection to the WTO online at
http://www.bite-back.org