|
Nov
20, 1999
You
Mean There's An Alternative
By
Jeremy Brecher and Brendan Smith
from
Z-NET
Z-NET
is free, but for 5 dollars a month (student rate) you can have access to
the daily commentaries, online-education, the chance to talk with the authors
of these articles, and much more.
Z-NET
is one of the most progressive sites on the Net.
Go
to http://www.zmag.org/Commentaries/donorform.htm
for information on the Sustainer program).
When
world leaders meet in Seattle after Thanksgiving for the "pre-millennial"
session of the World Trade Organization, many will sincerely believe that
there is no alternative to the present direction of globalization. But
all over the world, activists and scholars associated with environmental,
religious, labor, and other social movements have in fact been developing
such alternatives.
A
group of progressive members of Congress, NGOs, trade unionists, and expert
advisors have recently helped draft the Global Sustainable Development
Resolution, incorporating many ideas drawn from this international dialogue.
The
Resolution assumes that the common people of the world share profound common
interests. It seeks international cooperation to control out-of-control
global corporations, capital, and markets.
The
Resolution is designed to help unify disparate groups that are deeply concerned
about the impact of globalization on the environment, labor, poverty, democracy,
and human rights by integrating their concerns into a common program. It
seeks to address in an integrated way the economic needs of the worlds'
people and the need to protect and restore the environment, and the needs
of people in both first and third worlds.
The
Resolution assumes that global corporations and markets require global
regulation, but that a primary goal of such regulation should be to make
it possible for people in local communities around the world to control
their own economic lives. It tries to integrate the desire for local and
national autonomy and diversity with the need to control global forces
and actors.
The
Resolution lays out a pathway for reconstructing the global economy. It
assumes the program cannot be separated from the process of realizing it.
It is designed to strengthen, not to replace, efforts to change the global
economy by action in civil society.
Goals:
Current policy seems to be guided by the theory that the more international
trade and investment is better -- whatever the consequences. Under the
resolution, policy goals are defined, instead, in terms of what people
really need:
-
reducing
the threat of financial volatility and meltdown
-
democracy
at every level from the local to the global
-
human
rights for all people
-
environmental
sustainability worldwide
-
economic
advancement of the most oppressed and exploited groups
Initiating
Dialogue: So far, the global economy has been designed by small elites
meeting closed negotiating sessions and corporate boardrooms. The Resolution
proposes a U.S. Commission on Globalization and parallel Commissions around
the world to develop the broadest possible dialogue the future of the global
economy. It also proposes a Global Economy Truth Commission to investigate
abuses in the use of international funds and abuses of power by international
financial institutions.
Global
Sustainable Development Agreement: A series of Bretton Woods-type conferences,
with representation of civil society, will make recommendations for and
initiate negotiation of a Global Sustainable Development Agreement.
Global
Sustainable Development Financial Strategy: These negotiations will formulate
a strategy to counter those aspects of the global financial system that
make it more difficult for communities, regions, and countries to pursue
sustainable development. The purpose of this strategy is to restructure
the international financial system to avoid global recessions, protect
the environment, ensure full employment, reverse the polarization of wealth
and poverty, and support the efforts of polities at all levels to mobilize
and coordinate their economic resources.
The
financial strategy will provide an alternative to the "new financial architecture"
being proposed by the IMF, World Bank, G-7, and U.S. Treasury. It will:
-
encourage
economic policies based on domestic economic growth and development, not
domestic austerity in the interest of export-led growth.
-
encourage
the major industrial countries to coordinate their economic policies to
stimulate domestic demand and prevent global deflation.
-
help
countries adjust currency exchange rates without competitive devaluations.
-
develop
means for assuring global liquidity, such as an expansion of the system
of Special Drawing Rights.
-
reduce
the flows of destabilizing short-term capital by the adoption of capital
controls as necessary.
-
establish
standards for and oversee the regulation of banks and non-bank financial
institutions by national and international regulatory authorities.
-
encourage
the shift of financial resources from speculation to sustainable development
that is useful and environmentally positive, such as community development
and targeted investment for small- and medium-sized businesses and farmers.
-
establish
a tax on foreign currency transactions -- known as a "Tobin tax" -- to
reduce the volume of destabilizing short-term cross-border financial flows
and to provide pools of funds for investment in long-term environmentally
and socially sustainable development in poor communities and countries.
-
create
public international investment funds to meet human and environmental needs
and ensure adequate global demand by channeling funds into sustainable
long-term investment.
-
develop
international institutions to perform functions of monetary regulation
that are currently performed inadequately by national central banks, such
as a system of internationally coordinated minimum reserve requirements
on the consolidated global balance sheets of all financial firms.
Reform
of International Financial Institutions: The IMF the World Bank, and other
International Financial Institutions will be required to reorient their
programs from the imposition of austerity and destructive forms of development
to support for labor rights, environmental protection, rising living standards,
and encouragement for small and medium-sized local enterprises. The IMF
will terminate all activities except those fulfilling its original mandate
of addressing short-term external trade imbalances.
Debt
Reduction: Under the Resolution, the wealthy countries will write off the
debts of the most impoverished countries by the end of the year 2000. A
permanent insolvency mechanism will be established for adjusting the debts
of highly indebted nations.
Checks
on Unaccountable Corporate Power: To help establish public control and
citizen sovereignty over global corporations and reduce their ability to
evade local, state, and national law, the Resolution calls for a binding
Code of Conduct for Transnational Corporations which includes regulation
of labor, environmental, investment, and social behavior. In addition,
corporations incorporated and/or operating in the U.S. would be held liable
in U.S. courts for harms caused abroad.
Reform
of International Trade Agreements: WTO, NAFTA, and all other agreements
regulating international trade would be renegotiated to reorient trade
and investment to be means to just and sustainable development.
Critics
of the WTO have wisely called for a round of evaluation and reconsideration.
These proposals indicate the kinds of alternatives that ought to be on
the table
[note:
The full text of the Global Sustainable Development Resolution can be found
on the Internet at www.house.gov/bernie/legislation/imf/global.html.
The original co-sponsors include Reps. Sanders, Brown, McKinney, Kusinich,
Evans, DeFasio, and Lee.]
TOP
|