• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • TP について/About
  • Topics/トピクス
    • Gender/ジェンダー
    • Globalisation/グローバリゼーション
    • Japan and Asia/日本とアジア
    • Japanese/日本語
    • Media/メディア
    • News/ニュース
    • Social Justice/社会正義
    • War and Empire/戦争&支配権力
    • Environment/環境
    • Other Stories/他の記事
  • Links/リンク
  • Contact

TokyoProgressive

Linking Progressives East and West Since 1997

東西のプログレッシブをつなぐ − 1997年設立  |  Linking Progressives East and West Since 1997

Why Kan and some gov officials suddenly seem anti-nuclear

May 8, 2011 by tokyoprogressive Leave a Comment

A few interesting comments I have heard..

 A) Knowing that the DPJ and LDP have both promoted nuclear power because they get money from the industry, why is Kan suddenly anti-nuclear in his closing of Hamaoka for the time being?

 B) Why did one of his advisers, rapidly pro nuclear himself, suddenly quit the Kan advisory position he held?

I t could be that they both looked into the darkness of their souls  and saw the pacts they had made with the devil and had a reawakening.  Has happened before.  See Ray Anderson in the documentary THE CORPORATION: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_Anderson_%28entrepreneur%29 .

Or see  Arnie Gundersen, a formerly pro nuclear executive now in the anti-camp: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arnold_Gundersen

Or, it could be expedience. Or a combination of the two. One theory  I have seen advanced in recent days:

MORE DISASTERS TO FOLLOW?

There has been (an under-reported) extreme rise in temperature in Fukushima dai 3.  While people have been lulled into a false sense of normalcy  by escalators that run again and mineral water in the stores again, this portends more trouble on the horizon and Kan knows this, using the closing of Hamaoka to distract people over that.

This may explain why a secretive leader has suddenly appeared to have moral scruples—we are not out of the woods yet, and so for political expedience he is taking action on these other two—Hamaoka and Tsuruga.

WHY DOES A PUPPET OF JAPANESE-GOVERNMENT A-BOMB APOLOGISTS SUDDENLY DISCOVER HIS HUMANITY?

May also explain why a pro nuke advisor quit the other day -in the past he has advised AGAINST recognizing radiation sickness in  people the gov did not not heretofore recognize as hibakusha…both he and Kan now suddenly anti-nuke…not sure if this theory is true, but interesting.

And no, we should not be lulled into a false sense of security. I was one of those who in the beginning was fighting some of the foreign news reports, when the likes of THE MIRROR were emphasizing the dangers, and when the Japanese media was not showing the explosions or devastation.

 

ON THE CONTRADICTION IN  THE WESTERN MEDIA SEEMING TO BEING AHEAD OF THE JAPANESE MEDIA

In retrospect, this was correct because sensationalizing serves the interests of those stand to make a lot of money doing so, and because it distracted from the need to rescue people.  It still does. Some anti-nuke friends were quick to praise the foreign media like the NYT in comparison to the Japanese media in the beginning days of the multiple disasters. A mistake, because the same media has been complicit in covering up the crimes by governments and corporations in their jurisdictions. So we have the likes of the NY Times being a cheerleader for war.  Too quick to heap praise on the western media, in my view. Even if they got it better than the Japanese media.

While the western press balks at the top-down, authoritarianism of the press-club system in Japan, they toe the line when the US government and their multinational corporation owners give orders to sit on a story. Then again, many fine NHK documentaries exist on social issues outside Japan, but NHK is largely a corporate-government puppet insofar as Japanese social issues are concerned.

PANIC/HYSTERIA VS. COMPLACENCY

But my friends are still right that THIS government and THIS nation’s media are in denial about the severity of the crisis  (or in secret agreement to downplay it).  Yes, I think we have to put acknowledge that there is a certain amount of unscientific reaction to the crisis. Some label it hysteria. But I think it is justified by the coverups of the government and nuclear industry. So while most of us do not know our roentogens from our bequerals, our millisieverts from our microsieverts, we are right to ask whether a) the constant talk of things being under control, b) of there being no danger to humans (by the spokesman with the big ears, Edamame, as he is sometimes referred to, c) of it being ok for kids to get up to 20 millisieverts a year isn’t just a way to take the heat off the METI/MONKASHO/DPJ pact to keep the political machinery going and hoping the public eventually turns a blind eye to the corruption of the nuclear industry. This  happened before in Mad Cow (not good for US-Japan ties) or HIV (we have to consider that Green Cross Corporation and the government withheld the safer drugs available for hemophilia because they wanted to promote profits for this Japanese corporation  even if it meant that some, maybe half,  would contract HIV.) And this is when a young Naoto Kan was a fighter against such business-government ties.

HOW HIGH IS LOW?  HOW UNSAFE IS SAFE ENOUGH?

So yes, there is hysteria and uninformed commentary on just HOW dangerous things are.   Clearly many of us are overreacting to the “relatively” low levels.  Clearly there is more radiation on an airplane trip.  But Physicians for Social Responsibility has attacked the Mombusho approved  levels of radiation as being ok for kids, saying that by forcing  them to go to school in poisoned  areas with relatively high levels of radiation,  it “exposes them to a 1 in 200 risk of getting cancer. And if they are exposed to this dose for two years, the risk is 1 in 100. There is no way that this level of exposure can be considered ‘safe’ for children, ” they say. 

ACCUMULATED RISKS AND WHAT IS GOOD FOR BUSINESS IS GOOD ENOUGH FOR MERE HUMANS

Last year I had a 64-slice CT scan for coronary artery disease detection.  Much more radiation than I have sustained so far since I came back from Miyazaki-once for a few days on the worst day, when one of the reactors exploded, and then 3 weeks later on my second 2-week escape to Southern Japan. But I was also 100 km from 3 Mile Island in an era where we did not know as much as we do now. I was drinking the suddenly plentiful supplies of Turkish mineral water just after Chernobyl…and now, even though I try to be careful and not eat local produce, who knows how much I am eating from unknown sources should I eat out.  And then, I am 58, soon 59, but what about kids just born? Of those still in the womb? What about subtle and not so subtle DNA changes over time, that could affect future generations. And then we have to consider the conservative (read pro-business) scientists at agencies like the US FDA, who have traditionally said the risk of contracting “an additional” cancer from ingesting carcinogens in food additives was small. All this meant to allow dangerous products on the market rather than pass laws regulating them.

So yes, a number of my friends have been unscientific in their appraisal of the dangers facing us..ignoring the “wisdom” of nuclear apologists who point out that an airplane trip exposes one to much more danger.  But this is one MORE risk on top of many others in the environment, and when most of the assurances come from those who stand to lose from the demise of nuclear power, I prefer to err on the side of caution.

Remember, these reassurances are coming from METI and friends, a trade organization who are the main agency involved in nuclear safety, an education ministry which censors textbooks that promote critical thinking, an industry that profits from hyping the dangers of fossil fuel by downplaying its own dangers, increasingly hard to do I admit.

ON SECOND THOUGHT,  MAYBE THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY IS NOT ABOUT PROFITS BUT WAR

Meanwhile, Koide sensei of Kyodai, in an interview with Jimbo san, has commented that one reason J has pursued nuclear power despite knowing its dangers and costs is to become a member of the nuclear club, since the Constitution would not permit the development of nuclear weapons. Plus, with MOX, you have an easy route to those weapons should the political winds change, though Koide opines that Japan’s ability to create a weapon is probably still a way off as he does not think that highly of his fellow nuclear scientists’ abilities and common sense.

 

Feel free to repost so long as the entire message remains intact.

 

Filed Under: Environment/環境 Tagged With: nuclear waste

Join the Discussion

Comment on this article or respond to others' comments.

You can post below or send to the mailing list at discuss@list.tokyoprogressive.org.

a) Please sign you name at the bottom of your comment, so that we know who wrote it.

b) To prevent spam, comments need to be manually approved.

c) Comments which are insulting, racist, homophobic or submitted in bad faith will not be published.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Search the site

Archives

Main Categories (old and most recent)

Alternative News Contributors/投稿者 creative Democracy Now Environment/環境 Featured Gender/ジェンダー Globalisation/グローバリゼーション Jacobin Japan/日本 Japan and Asia/日本とアジア Japanese/日本語 Japan Focus Japan News Korea/韓国 latest latest-j links Media/メディア Mp3 National Security Archive neoliberalism new News/ニュース Other Stories/他の記事 Social Justice/社会正義 Topics Uncategorized Video War and Empire/戦争&支配権力

Search deeper

Abe Afghanistan alternative news Bush class issues and homelessness Environmental research fukushima gaza health care Henoko human rights Iraq Iraq, Afganistan and the War on Terror Iraq and Afghanistan, opposing the wars Israel Japan Japan news English Korea labor issues Latin America Middle East military North Korea nuclear nuclear waste Obama Okinawa Okinawa Palestine peace protest protest and resistance racism/human rights radiation state crimes Syria Takae Tepco Trump U.S. War world news English ニュース/社会問題 人権 平和、憲法9条

Design and Hosting for Progressives

Donate/寄付

Please support our work. This includes costs involved in producing this news site as well as our free hosting service for activists, teachers and students. Donations/寄付 can be sent to us via PayPal or Donately. You can also click on the buttons below to make a one-time donation.




Work with us

TokyoProgressive
supports and participates in projects of like-minded people and groups directly (technical, editing, design) and not-so directly (financial or moral support). Likewise, we also welcome contributions by readers that are consistent with promoting social justice. If you have a project you would like help with, or if you would like to submit an article, link, or report on a protest activity, please contact us here.

Footer

All opinions are those of the original authors and may not reflect the views of TokyoProgressive. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for by copyright law in several countries. The material on this site is distributed without profit.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Copyleft 1997-present: tokyoprogressive dot org

TokyoProgressive supports and participates in projects of like-minded people and groups directly (technical, editing, design) and not-so directly (financial or moral support). Likewise, we also welcome contributions by readers that are consistent with promoting social justice. If you have a project you would like help with, or if you would like to submit an article, link, or report on a protest activity, please contact us here.

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in